Year End Review

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

3:11 Featured Guests on the Podcast

5:45 Topics Discussed

9:36 Biggest Issues Facing the Beef Industry

14:29 Record Keeping

20:57 New Year’s Resolutions

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Pica Cornstalks and 4 Dead

It’s early November, the cows have just come off grass and turned onto cornstalks. The weather is cool and the cows were grazing well until the next day. Four cows were found dead by the producer. What happened? Tune into Tox Talk with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz to find out.

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Winter Feeding Plans, Cold Weather Management, Research Round-Up

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

2:14 Winter Feeding Plans

11:08 Cold Weather Management

17:58 Research Round-Up: Makenna Jensen

Guest: Makenna Jensen, Veterinary Student and BCI Graduate Student

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Johne’s Disease 

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Johne’s disease is gaining greater attention among beef cattle producers and veterinarians who work with beef cattle. Johne’s was first described in Germany early in the 20th century and is caused by the bacteria Mycobcterium paratuberculosis (which is related to the bacteria that causes tuberculosis in humans). The disease is usually spread to young calves through contact with infected manure or milk but infected cattle don’t show signs of the disease until several years later. The disease is more common among dairy herds compared to beef herds, primarily because dairy production is more confined with greater potential calf exposure to the manure of adult cattle, but can be a problem in some beef herds particularly herds marketing replacement bulls and heifers. 

Johne’s is primarily a disease of cattle, but can affect other ruminants such as sheep, goats, and even deer. The organism invades the small intestine and grows very slowly. Over time the organism spreads and infects more of the small intestine until enough of the intestine is thickened to cause diarrhea and weight loss even though the animal is eating well and behaves normally. Early in the disease, very few of the organisms are shed in the feces but as the infection involves more of the intestine, the animal sheds increasingly more of the bacteria in the manure. Older animals are fairly resistant to infection with the organism, but young calves are susceptible.  

Calves most commonly become infected during suckling by contact with their dam’s feces or the feces of other cows on their dam’s udder. The organism is also present in the colostrum and milk of heavily shedding dams. The younger the animal and the higher the dose of bacteria that the animal swallows, the greater the likelihood that the calf will become infected. In addition to swallowing the organism from contaminated teats or from colostrum or milk, the organism can also pass from the dam to the fetus during pregnancy. Cows that are in late stages of the disease (obviously losing weight and having diarrhea) will pass the organism to 20% to 40% of their calves during pregnancy and about 8% of calves from cows in early stages of the disease will be born with the infection. The bacteria that causes Johne’s can live in the environment for up to a year and manure contamination of clothes, boots, and equipment could also move the agent from one farm or ranch to another or from one part of a farm or ranch to a distant part. 

The economic loss of Johne’s in beef herds is fairly low at this time. A few animals will die or be so emaciated that they are condemned if presented for slaughter. Of greater potential economic impact is buyer perception of the importance of Johne’s disease. In the future, cattlemen may place great importance on purchasing cattle only from herds at low risk for Johne’s, and producers with infected herds would find the value of any bulls or heifers offered for sale to be discounted, and producers with low-risk herds would find the value of their animals increased.   

The difficulty in controlling Johne’s disease is that our current tests are only accurate fairly late in the disease process when the slow growing bacteria have reached a high enough population to be readily detected. We don’t have accurate tests for young cattle, so that infected cattle can stay in the herd shedding the organism at low levels into the environment before they can be detected, and young animals that are already infected are likely to test negative and can be purchased even though an effort is made to exclude test-positive replacements. No treatment is available to cure Johne’s in cattle. The only way to rid a herd of the organism is to identify infected cattle and remove them as soon as possible and instituting control methods to prevent infection of new young replacement stock. 

Voluntary control programs to minimize the risk of Johne’s have been implemented in some U.S. dairy herds. Those control programs focus on finding cows that shed a lot of Johne’s-causing organisms (our current tests are pretty good for this task) and removing them and their offspring from the herd. Also, efforts are focused on sanitation for the young calf – minimizing contact between young cattle (<6-12 months of age) with manure from adult animals and the milk and colostrum of cows other than their own dams. Efforts are also focused on preventing the introduction of possibly infected cattle into a herd by eliminating the introduction of replacement cattle from unknown sources (such as leasing bulls, purchasing nurse cows) and eliminating practices such as fertilizing pastures with manure from another farm.  

In general, beef herds should not obtain calves or colostrum from dairy herds unless the dairy herd is involved in a Johne’s control program and is at low risk for the disease. Beef producers should also cull any animal with chronic diarrhea and any of that animal’s offspring who are in the herd – even if the cow is pregnant. A strategy to improve sanitation and place constraints on animals entering the herd will help prevent many other diseases besides Johne’s. 

In addition to these baseline controls, some purebred herds follow testing guidelines approved by the National Johne’s Working Group (NJWG) and national U.S. Animal Health Association (AHA). In part, these guidelines recommend initially testing 30 females (three years and older) utilizing an ELISA blood test. Statistically, if all of those cows test negative you can be 85% sure that the herd does not have any Johne’s-infected cows. The NJWG guidelines recommend follow up procedures to further document a herd’s low-risk status over time.  

Herd Health: Calf Scours

In this episode of Herd Health Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White discuss calf scours – one of the most frustrating syndromes producers face. Dealing with a herd that has had a lot of issues last year resulting in sick calves and some that succumb to scours. Changing the environment and the producer comes in to make some changes this year.

AVC Highlights, Economic Questions, Confined Systems

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

3:39 AVC Highlights

10:45 Economic Questions

15:39 Confined Systems for Feeding Cows

Guest: Dr. Jason Warner, K-State Cow-Calf Extension Specialist 

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Consumer Ranking of Beef Sustainability Attributes 

Phillip Lancaster, MS, PhD
Ruminant nutritionist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
palancaster@vet.k-state.edu 

Beef sustainability continues to be a hot topic with the general consumer being the target of information campaigns from both sides. News stories and social media posts abound with information about how much greenhouse gas emissions beef cattle produce and how much water it takes to produce one pound of beef. On the other side, beef advocates promote the upcycling nature of beef production and the benefits of cattle on rangeland and ecosystem health. The average consumer does not have the knowledge and experience of the beef industry to sort these things out. How do consumers view beef production and what sustainability attributes are important to them? 

A recent consumer survey funded by the Kansas Beef Council asked several questions about which beef attributes are most important with particular focus on sustainability attributes. Consumers were asked to rank the importance of attributes like flavor, nutrition, affordability, animal welfare, antibiotic/hormone use, local beef, employee compensation, land and water conservation, and greenhouse gas emissions among others. Attributes ranked above average (greater than 0) by consumers from across the United States were the traditional attributes of freshness, food safety, affordability, and flavor (Figure 1). Among all the buzz about beef sustainability, these attributes are still the most important to the greatest proportion of consumers.  

Among beef sustainability attributes there was little difference in ranking with most attributes slightly below average in importance, but all of these were less important than typical attributes of the beef eating experience. Of the sustainability attributes, animal welfare and no added hormones or antibiotics were ranked the most important. This is similar to other consumer surveys, where animal welfare and no antibiotics are somewhat synonymous with sustainability in the mind of the consumer. Thus, continuing to improve animal husbandry and welfare is important for the beef industry, as well as continuing to communicate this to consumers. 

One of the surprising results was the low importance of nutritional value of beef. Beef is a good source of several vitamins and minerals and high-quality protein. In fact, beef is very nutrient dense meaning that the nutrient (i.e., vitamin, mineral, protein) to calorie ratio is high. Other foods require consuming many more calories to get the same amount of protein, iron, zinc, etc. as one serving of beef. This is an important aspect of beef sustainability in that cattle upcycle low-quality feeds into a highly nutritious product for human consumption. The low ranking of nutritional value of beef may indicate that further consumer education is necessary to overcome the past misrepresentation of red meat consumption on human health. 

Probably the most surprising result was the very low ranking of greenhouse gas emissions from beef. It seems that most of the negative news stories and social media posts about beef focus on the negative impact of the greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane. The reasons consumers ranked greenhouse gas emissions so low are unclear from this survey. Maybe the average consumer doesn’t consume much information about beef’s carbon footprint, maybe they understand that cattle are just replacing bison in the natural ecosystem and that the impact of beef cattle is relatively small, or maybe climate change is not that important to them. Other surveys have indicated that only 23% of consumers ranked greenhouse gas emissions as the most important meat sustainability topic compared to 52 and 57% ranking animal welfare and no hormone/antibiotics as the most important. Thus, it appears there are attributes of beef production that are more important to consumers than greenhouse gas emissions. 

Consumers do care about beef sustainability attributes but not at the expense of freshness, flavor, food safety and price. However, freshness, flavor, safety, and price were not the most important to 100% of consumers and sustainability attributes were important to a subset of consumers. The beef industry needs to continue to improve sustainability while educating consumers on past achievements and current progress to increase demand, but the improvement cannot come at the expense of beef freshness, flavor, safety, and price otherwise beef demand may have a net decrease. 

Figure 1. The average importance ranking of beef attributes by nationwide consumers. An average ranking of zero means that an equal number of consumers ranked that attribute as most and least important. 

Tox Talk: Unknown Problems and Answers

50 cows were grazing on cornstalks with a creek and woods running through it. On Sunday afternoon 9 younger cows were found dead by the producer with no previous clinical signs. By Monday when the veterinary arrives they find 6 more cows dead, 3 animals that were actively aborting and one with neurologic signs. What happened? Tune into Tox Talk with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz to find out what happened.

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Industry Inventory Counts, Winter Cow and Bull Management, Research Round-Up

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

3:10 Industry Inventory Counts: How Does it Impact Me?

10:18 Winter Cow and Bull Management  

18:43 Research Round-Up: Maddie Mancke

Guests: 
Dr. Jason Warner, K-State Cow-Calf Extension Specialist
Maddie Macke, Ph.D. Student

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Shared Heritage of Veterinary Medicine and the U.S. Cattle Industry 

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Veterinary medicine and cattle production have a long and shared heritage. I imagine that as people first started domesticating cattle to provide meat and milk, certain individuals had a particular interest in their health and well-being. Historical artifacts from as early as the Bronze Age indicate that there have long been people who were called upon to provide their expertise in the care and health of animals. The first known veterinary college was established in Lyon, France in 1761 and the first schools that focused on veterinary medicine in the United States were started in the middle to late 1800’s. Since the beginnings of veterinary medicine, the profession has been influenced by the contemporary theories and practices of human medicine and livestock production, and has a unique position at the intersection of medicine, animal health, and food production.  

Both in the past and currently, veterinarians have been responsible for identifying and treating individual cattle that become ill or injured. In addition, because cattle are often grouped into large herds, the health and well-being of herds and even multiple herds within a region has also been emphasized. The important role that cattle play in human health is based on the part that cattle play in providing meat and milk as sources of high quality protein and other essential nutrients. Cattle health also impacts human health because of some shared diseases such as brucellosis and tuberculosis.  

Veterinary medicine has had important roles to play in the establishment, growth, and maintenance of the U.S. cattle industry. Shortly after the Civil War, the early cattle drives from Texas to railheads where cattle could be shipped to the cities of the eastern U.S. almost came to an early end because of Texas Cattle Fever, a disease carried by ticks that could pass from the resistant Longhorn cattle to the susceptible cattle farther north and east. By establishing an early form of quarantine that effectively separated tick-carrying cattle from other cattle, railheads were established in Kansas towns such as Abilene, Ellsworth, Wichita, and Dodge City largely because they were located away from established herds and farms. Because of the importance of Texas Cattle Fever, in 1893 the Texas Legislature created the Livestock Sanitary Commission with the goal to eradicate the Texas cattle fever tick. Other state and federal programs to target and eliminate important diseases of cattle followed, with an official program of the federal government to eradicate bovine tuberculosis starting in 1917 and the federal brucellosis program starting in 1934. These successful federal efforts built upon the work started by cooperating veterinarians and cattle producers at local and state levels.  

Because of their training and experience dealing with diseases that cause illness, death, abortion, and production inefficiency, veterinarians have long been looked upon to diagnose and treat cattle that are noticeably ill. In addition, veterinarians focus on preventing disease and injury through animal management, nutrition, vaccination, quarantine, and parasite control. Veterinarians are also actively involved in optimizing reproductive efficiency through skills and services focused on heifer development, breeding season management, reproductive examinations of bulls, and prevention and treatment of calving difficulty.  

While many of the roles that veterinarians play today are exactly the same as the roles of animal health providers through the centuries, new roles are appearing. Veterinarians have increasingly important responsibilities for beef quality assurance (BQA), antimicrobial stewardship and cattle welfare. Because of the close relationships that veterinarians have with cattle producers as well as their responsibilities for animal health and public health, veterinarians continue to have a unique position in society to serve the interests of cattle producers, the cattle themselves, food consumers and the wider public.  

It is important to occasionally look back in time to appreciate the heritage that we all share in the cattle business, and the extraordinary people and situations that worked together to create the beef industry we have today. In addition, we look for lessons in the past as we address new problems and opportunities in cattle production and veterinary medicine as we plan for the future. 

Diving into Diets: Alternative Heifer Development

When raising replacement heifers what kind of rate of gain should a producer look for, what are their options for raising those heifers and what does the research tell us about how those decisions will impact not only the herds pregnancy rate but the bottom line. Join Dr. Philip Lancaster and Dr. Brad White as they discuss replacement heifer development in this episode of Bovine Science with BCI.

Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, Role of Genetics in Sustainability, What Can I do as a Producer

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

4:19 What is Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef?

10:42 Role of Genetics in Sustainability  

17:54 What can I do as a producer?

Guests:
Ruaraidh Petre, Executive Director Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef
Bob Weaber, Department Head Eastern Kansas Research and Extension Centers and Beef Cattle Geneticists  

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!