Artificial Intelligence for Animal Welfare: Detecting Pain in Cattle and Planning for the Future

This episode begins with a discussion of innovative research by Jake, a PhD student at Kansas State University, who is exploring whether artificial intelligence can detect pain in cattle by analyzing facial expressions. Using video recordings of newly castrated calves and non-castrated controls, researchers trained a machine-learning model to identify patterns associated with pain. While the system identified only about half of the painful animals, it was highly accurate when it predicted pain, suggesting promising future applications for automated health monitoring. The hosts discuss how camera systems placed near water sources or feeding areas could eventually help producers detect pain, illness, or lameness earlier than traditional observation methods.

The conversation then shifts to a listener question about mastitis in beef cows and heifers. The panel explains that although mastitis is less common in beef cattle than dairy cattle, it does occur and may be influenced by environmental factors such as dirty conditions, heavy fly pressure, or calves suckling inappropriate body areas. They emphasize looking for patterns involving age, pasture location, timing, and management practices rather than focusing solely on genetics, which likely play only a minor role.

In the final segment, the hosts discuss succession and transition planning for farms, ranches, and veterinary businesses. They stress the importance of beginning the process early, maintaining open communication among family members and stakeholders, and involving professional advisors such as attorneys and accountants. Special attention is given to challenges surrounding leadership transitions, inheritance decisions, and balancing the interests of family members who may or may not remain involved in the operation. The episode concludes by emphasizing that successful transitions require ongoing communication and evaluation long after the formal transfer of ownership or management has occurred.

Can More Vitamin A for Cows Improve Calf Health? The Challenge of Boosting Vitamin A Through Colostrum

This episode examines whether feeding additional vitamin A to cows before calving can improve the vitamin A status of their calves. Reviewing two dairy research studies, the hosts explore how late-gestation supplementation affects vitamin A levels in colostrum, milk, and newborn calves. In the first study, cows received vitamin A at levels slightly above recommended requirements, but researchers found no increase in colostrum vitamin A content and no meaningful improvement in calf blood vitamin A concentrations.

The second study supplemented cows with much larger amounts of beta-carotene, a precursor to vitamin A. While this significantly increased beta-carotene levels in colostrum and resulted in more calves having detectable beta-carotene after birth, it still failed to increase retinol, the active form of vitamin A, in calf blood samples. The findings suggest that transferring additional vitamin A from cow to calf through maternal supplementation is more difficult than many producers might expect.

The discussion reinforces that newborn calves receive very little vitamin A through placental transfer and rely heavily on colostrum as their primary source after birth. However, even feeding cows three to four times the recommended vitamin A levels produced only modest changes in calf vitamin A status.

The hosts also compare these dairy studies to previous beef cattle research, noting that very large supplementation rates may be required before measurable improvements occur in calves. As a result, simply increasing vitamin A intake in pregnant cows may not be an efficient solution for improving calf vitamin A status. The episode concludes by raising important questions about whether calves born to cows consuming stored hay during late gestation may benefit from alternative strategies, such as direct vitamin A supplementation, and emphasizes the need for additional research to better understand vitamin A requirements in modern beef production systems.

Learning Agriculture at the State Fair: From Calving Cows to Inspiring Future Veterinarians

Recorded live at the Kansas State Fair birthing center, this episode highlights the educational value of exposing the public to livestock production and animal health. The hosts discuss how the birthing center allows visitors to observe the calving process firsthand while learning about normal births, signs of labor, and situations that may require veterinary intervention. Through stories from veterinarians, listeners hear memorable examples of unusual calving cases, including prolapses, difficult births, and even a rare two-headed calf.

The episode also features conversations with fair attendees, livestock producers, FFA educators, veterinary students, and practicing veterinarians. One cattle producer describes how careful genetic selection and retaining ownership of cattle allow him to improve carcass quality and capture more value from his herd. An FFA advisor explains how state fair projects motivate students, build agricultural skills, and expose young people to opportunities in animal agriculture.

Veterinary students and recent graduates discuss career paths, emphasizing the value of hands-on experience, mentorship, and exploring different areas of veterinary medicine. The conversation highlights the diversity of mixed-animal veterinary practice, where a single day may involve cattle, companion animals, horses, or exotic species.

A recurring theme throughout the episode is workforce development and the importance of introducing young people to agriculture and veterinary medicine early in life. The hosts emphasize that creating enthusiasm through hands-on experiences, demonstrations, and educational outreach may be one of the most effective ways to inspire the next generation of agricultural professionals. The episode concludes with the successful birth of a calf at the birthing center, providing a live example of the natural processes and educational opportunities that make the exhibit such a valuable feature of the state fair.

Can Bull Behavior Predict Breeding Success? Using Technology to Identify Top Sires

This episode examines a 2026 study that explored whether pre-breeding behavior can predict which bulls will sire the most calves in multi-sire breeding pastures. Researchers fitted bulls with collars containing accelerometers and proximity sensors to objectively measure activity levels and social interactions before the breeding season. The goal was to determine whether behavioral traits such as activity, social connectedness, and interaction patterns were associated with a bull’s eventual siring capacity.

The study found that more active bulls tended to sire more calves, and bulls that were more socially connected within the group also appeared to have greater breeding success. Researchers used complex network-analysis measurements, including eigenvector centrality and relative strength, as indicators of social influence and interaction among bulls. Bulls with more diverse interactions across the bull group generally had higher siring capacity than bulls that spent most of their time with only a few herd mates.

The hosts found the concept particularly intriguing because previous efforts to predict breeding success often relied on subjective observations, while this study used objective monitoring technology. However, they also highlighted several limitations, including a relatively small sample size, missing sensor data, differences in bull grouping between years, and challenges associated with bulls entering or leaving breeding groups due to injury.

Another important finding was that some behavioral traits, especially activity level and social connectedness, showed moderate repeatability from year to year, suggesting they may reflect inherent characteristics of individual bulls rather than temporary conditions. The hosts emphasized that while the results are promising, the study should be viewed as an early step rather than definitive evidence. They concluded that larger studies across more herds and breeding environments will be necessary to determine whether wearable technology can reliably help producers identify the most effective breeding bulls before turnout.

Managing Bred Heifers and Stretching Forage: Preparing for a Successful Calving Season

Sponsored by Elanco, with guest Dr. Frank White, this episode focuses on two critical topics for cow-calf producers: managing bred heifers and maximizing forage utilization during challenging grazing conditions. The discussion emphasizes that first-calf heifers are among the most nutritionally demanding animals in the herd because they are still growing, carrying a calf, and preparing for lactation and rebreeding. As a result, maintaining a body condition score of approximately six at calving is highlighted as a key management goal to improve reproductive success and shorten the postpartum interval.

The hosts discuss the benefits of managing bred heifers separately from mature cows whenever possible, allowing producers to meet their higher nutritional requirements and reduce competition from older, dominant animals. When separate management is not feasible, they recommend increasing access to feed and supplements to ensure younger females are not pushed away from resources.

A major portion of the conversation addresses forage efficiency during drought and periods of declining forage quality. The speakers explain that cattle producers are really feeding the rumen microbes, which require adequate protein to digest low-quality forage effectively. When forage protein drops below critical levels, intake and digestibility decline, reducing the amount of nutrition cattle can obtain from available forage. Strategic protein supplementation can significantly improve forage utilization by supporting microbial activity in the rumen.

The group also notes that protein supplementation does not always need to occur daily, as cattle can recycle nitrogen and often maintain performance with less frequent feeding schedules. However, they caution that animals requiring significant weight gain or body condition improvement may need more intensive nutritional management. Overall, the episode stresses the importance of planning ahead, monitoring body condition early, and using nutrition strategically to position cattle for long-term success.

Vitamin A Before Calving: Why Hay Quality Matters More Than Supplements Alone

This episode explores how vitamin A nutrition in late-gestation cows affects both maternal health and the vitamin A status of newborn calves. The discussion builds on previous conversations about calf vitamin A deficiencies, emphasizing that colostrum is the primary source of vitamin A for newborn calves and that deficiencies early in life can persist for weeks or months.

The hosts review two research studies examining how vitamin A and its precursors are affected by rumen fermentation. The first study found that beta-carotene, the precursor to vitamin A found in green forages such as alfalfa, remains relatively stable during rumen fermentation, suggesting that high-quality green hay can be an excellent source of vitamin A for pregnant cows. They note that protecting hay from sunlight is important because ultraviolet light accelerates degradation of carotenoids, reducing the vitamin A value of stored forage.

The second study evaluated supplemental vitamin A and found that degradation of common vitamin A supplements increased substantially in higher-concentrate diets. In some cases, only about 30% of the supplemented vitamin A remained after 24 hours of fermentation in rumen fluid from cattle fed more concentrate-heavy diets. Interestingly, the form of the supplement had little effect on degradation, while diet composition had a much larger influence.

The practical takeaway is that producers should focus first on preserving and feeding high-quality green forage during late gestation, while also considering whether additional vitamin A supplementation may be necessary when hay quality is poor or concentrate feeding levels increase. The episode reinforces that thoughtful forage management and nutrition planning before calving can improve vitamin A delivery to cows, support colostrum quality, and help set calves up for better health after birth.

Lessons from the Birthing Center: Calving, Education, and Inspiring Future Agricultural Leaders

Recorded live at the Kansas State Fair Birthing Center, this episode highlights the educational value of giving the public a firsthand look at animal agriculture and the birthing process. The hosts discuss how the birthing center has served as a popular attraction for decades, allowing visitors to observe calves, piglets, and lambs being born while learning more about animal health and livestock production.

The conversation explores the signs of impending calving, including behavioral changes, relaxation of structures around the tailhead, and the progression of labor. The veterinarians explain how they determine when a cow may need assistance and discuss common causes of calving difficulty, such as abnormal calf positioning. Throughout the episode, listeners receive practical insights into gestation lengths, fetal development, and the biological similarities between livestock and human births.

A major focus of the discussion is agricultural education and youth involvement. FFA advisor Mrs. Chase from Wellington shares how projects at the state fair help students develop agricultural skills, showcase their work, and gain exposure to industries they might not otherwise experience. The hosts also discuss strategies for encouraging students to consider careers in veterinary medicine and agriculture, emphasizing mentorship, hands-on experience, and a willingness to start with basic tasks and learn over time.

The episode concludes with a successful live birth at the birthing center, giving listeners a real-time example of normal calving behavior. As the newborn calf arrives and the cow immediately begins grooming it, the hosts explain how those maternal behaviors help stimulate the calf, encourage standing and nursing, and strengthen the bond between cow and calf. Overall, the discussion celebrates the value of agricultural outreach, hands-on learning, and helping the public better understand where livestock and food production begin.

When Fly Spray Turns Toxic: A Costly Insecticide Mixing Mistake

This case study examines a situation where a producer attempted to control a heavy fly burden by spraying cattle with a topical insecticide, only to have several cows develop severe toxic signs within hours. Affected animals became recumbent, excessively salivated, developed diarrhea, experienced respiratory distress, and showed muscle tremors and weakness, raising immediate concerns about insecticide toxicity.

The investigation focused on two common groups of insecticides used in cattle: organophosphates and pyrethroids. Because the cattle exhibited the classic “SLUD” syndrome of excessive salivation, lacrimation, urination, and defecation, the evidence pointed strongly toward organophosphate poisoning. Review of the product label revealed that the insecticide had been mixed at a dramatically higher concentration than recommended. Instead of being diluted according to animal-use directions, the concentrate was mixed at a strength far closer to premise-spray concentrations, resulting in massive overdosing.

The discussion highlights how many insecticide products contain multiple sets of directions depending on whether they are being used on facilities, back rubbers, or directly on animals, making careful label review essential. Once toxicity was identified, treatment focused on immediately washing cattle with detergent and water to remove residual insecticide from the skin and administering atropine to reduce secretions and support breathing.

Fortunately, the affected cattle recovered after treatment, demonstrating the importance of rapid recognition and intervention. The case serves as a reminder that insecticides are highly potent compounds designed to affect nervous system function and must be handled with extreme care. Proper dilution, careful reading of product labels, and attention to species-specific application instructions are critical to preventing potentially fatal mistakes during fly control programs.

Antibiotics, Antimicrobials & Recovery: New Insights in Beef Cattle Health

In this episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses post-treatment intervals for cattle treated for respiratory disease, featuring graduate research from our guest Katherine Shirley comparing three- and six-day intervals. The results suggest that allowing cattle more time to recover before retreatment may reduce treatment failures and the likelihood of chronic issues.

The conversation also explores the distinction between antibiotics and antimicrobials, antimicrobial resistance, and emerging alternatives such as probiotics, prebiotics, essential oils, plant extracts, and other natural compounds. The group discusses research into alternatives for rumen health and liver abscess prevention, including promising work with sorghum extracts. Throughout, the experts emphasize that successful cattle recovery involves more than drug selection—it also depends on nutrition, environment, comfort, and proper nursing care.

This episode is sponsored by Virbac. Learn more at virbac.com

How Heritable Is Fertility in Beef Cattle?

In this episode of Bovine Science, we examine a 2024 Journal of Animal Science study that used hundreds of thousands of cattle records to investigate the genetic and environmental influences on fertility in beef cattle. The study evaluated traits including calving date, calving interval, first-calf interval, early calving, and heifer pregnancy.

The discussion highlights that most fertility traits have very low heritability, meaning management decisions such as nutrition, body condition, breeding-season length, and bull fertility have a much greater influence on reproductive performance. Heifer pregnancy was the exception, showing moderate heritability and providing a potential opportunity for genetic selection. The study also found no evidence that selecting for greater weaning or yearling weight negatively affects fertility, with yearling weight actually showing a positive association with heifer pregnancy.

Setting Calves Up for Success: Early-Life Health, Vaccination, and Management

This episode is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim and focuses on the importance of early calf health and how management decisions made before and shortly after birth can influence lifetime performance. The discussion emphasizes that calf success begins long before calving, with proper nutrition, body condition, and vaccination programs for cows playing critical roles in producing healthy, vigorous calves. Dr. D.L. Step highlights the importance of preparing cows to provide quality colostrum and a strong immune foundation for newborn calves.

The group discusses how pre-weaning disease can have long-term impacts on growth and productivity, making prevention a key management goal. Beyond vaccination itself, the speakers stress the importance of proper vaccine handling, including correct storage temperatures, avoiding disinfectant residues in syringes, and using modified-live vaccines within the recommended time after mixing. Mishandling vaccines can reduce their effectiveness even when the correct products are selected.

The conversation also explores the role of stress management in successful vaccination programs. Calves respond better when they are handled quietly, maintained on an adequate nutritional plane, and processed in low-stress environments. The speakers note that vaccine response is influenced not only by the product itself but also by calf age, maternal nutrition, colostrum intake, and overall herd management.

A recurring theme is the value of recordkeeping, which allows producers to evaluate outcomes, identify trends, and continuously improve their health programs over time. Ultimately, the episode concludes that successful calf health programs rely on combining sound nutrition, effective vaccination practices, careful handling, and long-term management planning rather than relying on any single intervention.

A New Approach to Mycoplasma Control: Evaluating a Modified-Live Vaccine in Young Calves

This episode reviews a 2026 study investigating whether a modified-live Mycoplasma bovis vaccine can help protect young calves from one of the most frustrating respiratory disease pathogens in the cattle industry. The researchers conducted a controlled challenge trial in neonatal calves, comparing vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups after exposure to Mycoplasma bovis.

The results showed several encouraging outcomes for vaccinated calves. They experienced fewer lung lesions, fewer days with fever, and a shorter duration of clinical illness compared with non-vaccinated controls. In addition, vaccinated calves developed higher antibody levels both before and after challenge, suggesting that the vaccine stimulated a meaningful immune response.

The discussion also highlights important statistical considerations. While the study found positive effects on lung lesions and fever duration, some clinical disease measures showed less dramatic differences, emphasizing the need to carefully interpret challenge-study data. The hosts point out that challenge trials measure vaccine efficacy under controlled conditions, which differs from vaccine effectiveness in real-world ranch environments.

Another key point is that the study was funded and conducted by researchers affiliated with the vaccine manufacturer, making critical evaluation of study design and interpretation especially important. Despite those limitations, the trial was well designed, with randomization, blinding, and strong biosecurity controls. Overall, the paper provides promising evidence that a modified-live Mycoplasma bovis vaccine may become a useful tool for respiratory disease management, while also underscoring the need for larger field studies to determine how well those results translate to commercial cattle operations.

Estrus Intensity Matters: Using Heat Activity to Improve Reproductive Success

herd of cattle

This episode is sponsored by Estrotect and features Dr. George Perry from Texas A&M AgriLife, who discusses how estrus intensity influences reproductive performance in beef cattle and how producers can use that information to improve breeding decisions. While many producers think of estrus as a simple yes-or-no event, the discussion highlights that the intensity of estrus, measured by mounting activity or other indicators, can provide valuable insight into fertility. Calves and cows that exhibit stronger estrus prior to fixed-time artificial insemination consistently achieve higher conception rates than those showing weak or no signs of estrus.

The conversation explains that estrus remains important even in synchronization and fixed-time AI programs, where breeding occurs on a set schedule. Research has shown that cattle displaying estrus before insemination can have conception rates more than 20 percentage points higher than those that do not. This information can help producers make more strategic decisions about which animals receive sexed semen or higher-value genetics.

The group also emphasizes that management factors such as nutrition, body condition score, postpartum interval in cows, and puberty status in heifers often have a greater influence on estrus expression than genetics alone. Advances in estrus detection technology, including activity monitors and improved heat-detection aids, now provide producers with more detailed information than traditional visual observation methods.

Ultimately, the discussion concludes that estrus intensity is not merely a biological curiosity but a valuable management tool. By combining sound nutrition, synchronization protocols, and improved estrus detection, producers can make better breeding decisions that improve conception rates, calf performance, and the long-term productivity of the herd.

Solving the Toxicology Mystery: A Systematic Approach to Vague Cattle Health Problems

This episode focuses on some of the most challenging cases veterinarians encounter: cattle with vague signs such as weight loss, poor condition, or an unexplained death where no obvious cause is apparent. Dr. Scott Fritz explains that these situations are often far more difficult than classic acute poisonings because there is rarely a clear syndrome, exposure event, or obvious diagnostic clue. Instead, investigations must begin with a thorough history, careful necropsy, and a detailed evaluation of management changes, environmental conditions, forage availability, and grazing patterns.

The discussion highlights the importance of considering toxic plants while recognizing that simply finding a toxic plant in a pasture does not prove it caused disease. Weather conditions, grazing pressure, herbicide use, mowing, drought stress, and seasonal plant growth can all influence the likelihood that cattle consume potentially toxic species. The speakers also emphasize the value of examining rumen contents, collecting representative samples, and working closely with diagnostic laboratories to choose appropriate tests rather than ordering broad, unfocused toxicology screens.

Special attention is given to ocular fluid sampling, which can serve as a useful substitute for blood testing after death and help diagnose conditions such as nitrate poisoning. The episode explains that successful toxicology investigations rarely rely on a single laboratory result. Instead, diagnosis usually comes from combining clinical signs, animal history, environmental observations, necropsy findings, pathology results, and targeted laboratory testing.

A key takeaway is that toxicology cases are often diagnoses of exclusion, requiring patience and collaboration among veterinarians, diagnosticians, toxicologists, botanists, and producers. By taking a systematic approach and preserving high-quality samples early in the investigation, producers and veterinarians improve their chances of identifying the true cause and preventing future losses.

High Cattle Prices, Smart Investments, and Getting Started in the Cattle Business

This episode focuses on how producers can take advantage of strong cattle prices, both by improving existing operations and by helping the next generation enter the industry. The discussion begins with ideas for reinvesting profits into long-term improvements such as water systems, fencing, grazing infrastructure, land enhancement projects, and other investments that may take years to fully pay off but can improve productivity and quality of life on the ranch.

The hosts also explore diversification strategies, including alternative livestock enterprises, hunting-related income, and other complementary businesses that can provide revenue streams not directly tied to cattle markets. A key theme is balancing short-term opportunities with long-term sustainability through careful planning and strategic investments.

The conversation then shifts to the challenges facing young people who want to enter the cattle industry during a period of historically high cattle values. The group emphasizes that aspiring producers do not need to start large and should instead look for ways to leverage labor, management skills, and relationships to gain access to cattle, land, or grazing opportunities. Examples include leasing cattle, custom grazing stocker cattle, entering partnerships, or gradually building an operation through small-scale opportunities.

The hosts stress the importance of developing a written business plan, understanding costs and potential revenue, and seeking advice from experienced professionals such as lenders, extension agents, veterinarians, nutritionists, and other producers. Building strong personal networks and identifying mentors can be just as valuable as obtaining financial capital. Ultimately, the episode encourages producers to think strategically, invest wisely during profitable times, and recognize that successful cattle operations are often built gradually through planning, patience, and strong relationships.

Do Vaccines Affect Bull Fertility? Evaluating Breeding Soundness After Modified Live and Killed Vaccines

This episode examines a 2025 study that investigated whether modified-live or killed viral vaccines influence bull breeding soundness exam (BSE) results. The research addressed a common practical question among producers and veterinarians who are concerned that vaccination before breeding season might negatively affect fertility. Researchers randomly assigned mature bulls to receive either a modified-live or killed vaccine and then evaluated semen quality and breeding soundness multiple times over a full spermatogenesis cycle.

The study found no statistically significant differences between vaccine types for key fertility measures such as sperm morphology and motility. These findings suggest that neither vaccine type caused major detrimental effects on reproductive performance in the mature bulls that were tested. However, the discussion highlights an important limitation: the study included only 11 bulls, making it difficult to detect smaller but potentially meaningful differences between treatments.

The authors and hosts note that while some bulls consistently passed breeding soundness exams and others consistently performed poorly, these differences appeared to reflect individual animal variation rather than vaccine effects. The episode also raises questions about whether results would be similar in yearling bulls, which may respond differently than mature animals.

Overall, the study provides reassuring evidence that vaccinating mature bulls with either modified-live or killed viral vaccines does not appear to cause major fertility problems. At the same time, the discussion emphasizes that additional research with larger numbers of bulls is needed to rule out smaller effects and strengthen confidence in the conclusions.

Maintaining Beef Demand and Building the Next Generation Workforce

This episode explores two important topics for the beef industry: long-term consumer demand for beef and strategies for workforce development. The discussion begins with a listener question about how changing cattle inventories, feed costs, and finishing weights could affect beef quality and consumer demand in the future. The hosts note that while heavier cattle and extended feeding periods have contributed to quality improvements, genetic progress has played an even larger role in maintaining high levels of marbling and eating satisfaction. They emphasize that taste, freshness, safety, and price remain the key drivers of beef demand, making it essential for producers to continue delivering a high-quality product.

The group also discusses how shifts in feed costs and cattle numbers may influence production decisions, but they do not expect a dramatic decline in beef quality because of the industry’s long-term genetic improvements and management practices. Food safety and Beef Quality Assurance programs are highlighted as critical components for maintaining consumer trust and protecting demand.

The second half of the episode focuses on labor shortages and workforce development in agriculture. Rather than expecting to hire fully trained employees, the hosts encourage producers to view workforce development as an investment, recognizing that inexperienced workers require training, mentorship, and time to become productive. They recommend creating internship or trial opportunities, partnering with organizations such as 4-H and FFA, and focusing on individuals who show enthusiasm and a willingness to learn. The discussion emphasizes that successful workforce development often requires patience, realistic expectations, and a commitment to helping employees build skills over time. Ultimately, the episode concludes that both sustaining beef demand and developing future employees require long-term thinking, continuous improvement, and a willingness to invest in future success.

Rethinking Vitamin A in Beef Cattle: Why Calves May Be Deficient Despite Green Grass

This episode explores the role of vitamin A in beef cow-calf systems and examines why some calves develop low vitamin A levels and respiratory disease even while grazing alongside cows on green pasture. The discussion highlights that vitamin A nutrition is more complex than simply having access to lush forage, because cattle primarily consume beta-carotene from grass, which must be converted into usable vitamin A by the body.

A major takeaway is the importance of colostrum as the primary source of vitamin A for newborn calves. Because very little vitamin A is transferred across the placenta, calves are born with limited reserves and depend heavily on colostrum intake during their first hours of life. Research cited in the review shows that delays in colostrum consumption can negatively affect vitamin A status for weeks after birth.

The discussion also challenges long-standing assumptions about vitamin A requirements. Current beef cattle recommendations are largely based on research conducted decades ago, despite major changes in cattle genetics and productivity over time. Recent studies suggest that supplementation levels commonly considered adequate may not be sufficient to maintain optimal vitamin A status in modern cows or their calves.

One particularly striking finding is that even when cows received vitamin A supplementation at nearly three times traditional recommended levels, about 20% of calves still failed to achieve adequate vitamin A status. The authors suggest that late gestation nutrition deserves greater attention because maternal vitamin A status strongly influences the amount transferred through colostrum. Overall, the episode emphasizes that vitamin A management remains an unresolved area in beef production and may play a larger role in calf health and disease resistance than previously recognized.

Finding Value in Every Class of Cattle: Records, Flexibility, and Management Decisions

young cow

This episode features Nebraska cattle producer Rylee Blomenkamp, who discusses how her family’s operation manages a diverse mix of cattle, including feeder calves, yearlings, bred cows, open cows, bulls, and other opportunistic purchases. A central theme is the importance of identifying value in different classes of cattle and adapting management strategies to changing market conditions. Rylee explains that their operation succeeds by remaining flexible and taking advantage of opportunities that arise in local auction markets rather than focusing on a single type of livestock.

The discussion highlights the role of detailed recordkeeping in evaluating profitability across multiple enterprises. Rather than treating the operation as one large business unit, the family tracks expenses, feed costs, and returns for different classes of cattle, allowing them to determine where value is being created and which enterprises are most profitable. Experts emphasize that even cow-calf producers can benefit from separately evaluating replacement heifers, cull cows, and feeder calves to improve decision-making.

The group also discusses the importance of keeping cattle separated by age, size, and production purpose to better manage health and nutrition. Different groups require different feeding programs, health protocols, and marketing strategies, making thoughtful organization critical to success. Nutritional management is tailored to each class of cattle, from growing calves to bred cows and finishing animals, helping maximize performance while controlling costs.

A key takeaway is that successful producers combine strong records with practical experience, using both data and market awareness to guide decisions. Ultimately, the episode emphasizes that having a plan is important, but maintaining flexibility and adapting to changing conditions is often what creates long-term profitability and sustainability.

This episode is sponsored by Ambrook.

PlayPlay

Can Coronavirus Vaccination Reduce Pre-Weaning Respiratory Disease in Beef Calves?

herd of cattle

This episode reviews a 2026 Canadian study that evaluated whether vaccinating beef calves against bovine coronavirus could reduce pre-weaning respiratory disease in a commercial cow-calf herd with a history of respiratory problems. The researchers compared vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves under real-world ranch conditions, making the findings especially relevant for producers facing similar challenges. Results showed that vaccinated calves had lower odds of requiring treatment for respiratory disease before turnout, and overall disease rates tended to be lower in vaccinated groups.

The study also included an economic analysis that suggested vaccination provided a financial advantage of approximately $10 per calf through reduced treatment costs, lower mortality, and improved performance. Interestingly, one of the strongest factors associated with disease risk was not vaccination status but the calf’s birth cycle, with calves born during certain calving periods experiencing significantly different disease outcomes.

The discussion highlights several strengths of the research, particularly that it was conducted in a commercial herd rather than a controlled challenge trial, providing valuable insight into how vaccines perform under field conditions. However, the hosts also note limitations, including questions about experimental independence, blinding, and the use of a coronavirus vaccine in a manner different from its labeled route of administration.

A key takeaway is that while coronavirus vaccination may offer another tool for reducing pre-weaning respiratory disease, it should not be viewed as a complete solution. The larger lesson is that herd management systems, calving patterns, and other underlying risk factors may play an even greater role in disease occurrence than any individual vaccine. Ultimately, the episode encourages producers to combine disease-prevention tools with a broader systems-based approach when addressing respiratory disease in cow-calf herds.

PlayPlay

Research Frontiers and Pain Management: Improving Cattle Health Through Better Decisions

This episode features a discussion with several Beef Cattle Institute researchers who share updates on current projects aimed at improving cattle health, welfare, and production efficiency. Topics include new technologies for semen evaluation, investigations into feeding patterns associated with interstitial pneumonia and liver abscesses, machine learning tools for detecting pain in cattle, and research on how water quality affects livestock performance. These projects highlight the growing role of technology and data analysis in solving practical problems faced by producers.

The group also addresses a listener question about weaning calves from large grazing allotments where producers have limited opportunities to handle animals before weaning. Rather than focusing solely on vaccines or medications, the discussion emphasizes reducing stress through strategies such as favorable weather conditions, low-stress weaning methods, gradual adaptation to feed and water sources, and thoughtful management of the overall system.

A major segment focuses on pain management in cattle and how attitudes toward animal welfare have evolved over time. The panel discusses procedures such as castration, dehorning, branding, dystocia management, and prolapse repair, noting that pain mitigation can improve welfare even when production responses such as average daily gain are difficult to measure. Researchers argue that producers should consider broader outcomes, including animal comfort, health, recovery, and public expectations for livestock care.

The conversation emphasizes that many producers genuinely want to provide the best care possible and are often willing to use pain-control tools when practical options are available. Ultimately, the episode highlights the value of systems thinking, continuous research, and proactive management in advancing both cattle well-being and industry sustainability.

A Deadly Holding Pen: Poisoning Causes Sudden Loss of 14 Heifers

heifers in pasture

This case study examines a tragic incident in which 14 open heifers died within hours of being separated from a larger group following pregnancy testing. The heifers had been placed in a familiar holding pasture with a functioning water source and secure fencing, leading managers to initially believe the environment was safe. When all 14 animals were found dead later that day, investigators quickly ruled out infectious disease and focused on acute toxic causes due to the rapid onset and 100% mortality rate.

Potential causes considered included nitrate toxicity, cyanide poisoning, urea exposure, toxic plants, and other fast-acting toxins. Necropsies revealed few significant lesions, a common finding in animals that die rapidly from certain toxic exposures. Diagnostic testing of ocular fluid showed highly elevated nitrate levels, providing strong evidence of nitrate poisoning.

Further investigation of the holding area uncovered several nitrate-accumulating plants, including pigweed, kochia, and sorghum-type grasses, all containing nitrate concentrations high enough to cause acute death. Environmental conditions and plant stress likely contributed to dangerous nitrate accumulation, while the hungry heifers rapidly consumed the available vegetation after being placed in the pen.

The discussion highlights that facilities used safely for years can become hazardous when weather patterns, forage conditions, or management circumstances change. A key takeaway is to carefully evaluate holding pens for potentially toxic weeds, especially during late summer, and avoid turning hungry cattle into unfamiliar areas with questionable forage. Providing supplemental hay before and during confinement may be one of the simplest and most effective strategies for preventing similar losses.

BRD Around the World and the Economics of Creep Feeding

cows in the pasture

This episode features a discussion with guest Dr. Selwyn Headley from Brazil, who shares insights into bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and how it compares to cases seen in North America. The group notes that many of the same bacterial and viral pathogens are involved in both regions, including Mannheimia, Histophilus, and several respiratory viruses, although some differences in prevalence and diagnostic findings exist. They emphasize that BRD is best viewed as a syndrome involving multiple pathogens and risk factors rather than a disease caused by a single organism. Common stressors such as transportation, commingling of cattle from multiple sources, and feedlot arrival continue to play major roles in disease development across both countries.

The conversation then shifts to creep feeding, defined as providing feed that nursing calves can access while their dams cannot. The hosts explain that creep feeding is often considered when forage quality or quantity declines late in the grazing season and producers want to maintain calf growth. While creep feeding can increase weight gain, its economic value depends on feed costs, calf prices, forage conditions, and how much feed is actually converted into additional gain.

The panel discusses how creep feed often substitutes for forage intake rather than reducing milk consumption, meaning it may not significantly improve cow body condition. They also note that feed type matters, with high-fiber feeds typically providing better supplementation and less forage substitution than starch-heavy grain sources. Additional considerations include the impacts on replacement heifers and breeding stock, where excessive energy intake at certain developmental stages may have long-term consequences. Overall, the episode highlights the importance of evaluating both biological responses and economic returns when deciding whether creep feeding is the right strategy for a particular operation.

The Mystery Eye Disease Outbreak: Investigating a Point-Source Event in Stocker Cattle

group of white cows

This case study follows the investigation of a puzzling eye disease outbreak affecting approximately 10% of a group of 1,200 stocker cattle shortly after processing and placement on pasture. The affected animals developed severe eye lesions, including corneal cloudiness, swollen eyelids, redness, and inflammation, but lacked many of the classic ulcers typically associated with pinkeye. Because cases appeared almost simultaneously across numerous pastures separated by up to 90 miles, investigators quickly determined the outbreak did not fit the pattern of a contagious, spreading disease.

Instead, the timing and distribution suggested a point-source event linked to something the cattle experienced while gathered together during processing. Common causes such as pinkeye, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), and mycoplasma infections were initially considered, but diagnostic testing failed to identify a clear infectious agent. Necropsies, histopathology, and laboratory testing revealed unusual eye lesions but provided no definitive diagnosis.

The investigation expanded to include less common possibilities such as malignant catarrhal fever and even immune-mediated eye disease, although evidence remained inconclusive. Interestingly, the outbreak peaked about two weeks after processing and then rapidly subsided without continuing spread, further supporting the point-source theory. The discussion highlights the importance of using epidemiology, history, and case patterns to guide investigations when laboratory answers are unavailable. Ultimately, while the exact cause remained unknown, the case demonstrates how understanding disease patterns can help narrow possibilities and inform future management decisions.

Mineral Sources, Microbiomes, and Managing Cattle Health Beyond the Basics

herd of cattle walking

This episode explores two important but often misunderstood topics in cattle production: mineral supplementation and the microbiome. The discussion begins with a listener question about whether the source of minerals in a supplement matters. The hosts explain that mineral bioavailability can vary significantly depending on whether minerals are supplied as sulfates, chlorides, oxides, or organic complexes, and that not all sources are equally effective. For example, copper oxide has relatively poor bioavailability compared to copper sulfate, while other mineral sources differ less dramatically.

Resource: https://ksubci.org/tools/calculators/ “Evaluating mineral feed tags for beef cattle”

The group emphasizes that mineral needs are highly dependent on local soils, forage quality, and the presence of antagonistic compounds such as sulfur, iron, or molybdenum. As a result, selecting the right mineral program requires more than simply comparing prices and nutrient percentages on a feed tag.

The conversation then shifts to the microbiome, defined as the community of microorganisms living within and on animals, particularly in the digestive tract. These microbes play critical roles in digestion, nutrient utilization, and overall health, especially in ruminants that depend on microbial fermentation to break down forage. The hosts note that research is increasingly showing links between the microbiome and broader physiological outcomes, including metabolism, disease susceptibility, and animal performance.

They also discuss how management decisions, diet changes, stress, and antibiotic use can alter microbial populations, though many of those effects are not yet fully understood. While microbiome research remains in its early stages, the episode highlights its potential to reshape how producers think about health and nutrition, moving beyond the traditional view that all microbes are harmful and toward a more systems-based understanding of cattle production.