Pre-breeding Heifer Management, Length of Bull Breeding Season, USDA Cattle Inventory Numbers

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

2:02 Pre-breeding Heifer Management

12:35 Listener Question: Length of Bull Breeding Season

18:01 USDA Cattle Inventory Numbers 

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: Early Diagnosis of Pneumonia

Join Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White as they discuss a paper looking at Short Communication: Circadian variations and day-to-day variability of clinical signs used for the early diagnosis of pneumonia within and between calves.

View the full paper here

After the Abstract is recorded with the goal of assisting veterinarians in the interpretation of scientific literature.  This podcast is not an endorsement of specific practices and medical decisions should only be made in consultation with your veterinarian.

Cattle on Feed Report, Hoof Care, Research Round-Up

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

2:23 Cattle on Feed Report

12:24 Listener Question: Hoof Care

17:32 Research Round-Up: Luis Feitoza

Guest: Luis Feitoza, Graduate Research Assistant

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Maintaining or Gaining Weight Post-Calving is Essential to Minimize Postpartum Interval 

Phillip Lancaster, MS, PhD
Ruminant nutritionist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
palancaster@vet.k-state.edu 

As we begin spring calving season, focus is often on the calf – making sure it gets colostrum, is healthy, nursing, and thriving – but the dam may get less attention. The focus on the dam is not primarily about the calf by her side, but rather about the calf she will have next year or more specifically when she will have that calf. Some good targets for reproductive success include a 365-day calving interval, 80% of cows calving in first 42 days of the calving season, and < 5% open cows. Achieving these targets revolves around managing the postpartum interval, which is that time period between calving and resumption of estrous cycles. 

Reproductive function in cows is highly related to the amount of body fat and the plane of nutrition, most likely the amount of blood glucose supported by the diet. Cows with less than body condition score (BCS) of 5 at start of breeding have longer postpartum intervals and thus longer calving intervals. One of the goals then is to have cows at BCS 5 at calving because getting cows to gain body fat during early lactation is difficult and not cost effective. However, even cows at BCS 5 at calving but lose weight between calving and start of the breeding season have longer postpartum intervals (Figure 1). 

To maintain a 365-day calving interval, the cow must rebreed by 80 days postpartum. Previous research indicates that cows maintaining body weight after calving, resume estrous cycles 30 to 40 days after calving, but cows losing body weight after calving don’t resume estrous cycles until 40 to 60 days after calving. Thus, cows maintaining body weight have 2 estrous cycles to get rebred, whereas, cows losing body weight have only 1 estrous cycle to get rebred to maintain the 365-day calving interval. 

First-calf heifers are a unique subset of the cow herd when it comes to the postpartum interval. First-calf heifers take about 20 days longer to resume estrous cycles after calving than mature cows and should calve at least 3 weeks prior to the mature cows. But also, first-calf heifers need a amount of body fat to minimize the postpartum interval. First-calf heifers have shorter postpartum intervals when calving at BCS 6 than BCS 5, whereas, BCS 5 is optimum for mature cows. Additionally, since first-calf heifers are still growing themselves, they need a higher plane of nutrition after calving to resume estrous cycles – maintaining body weight is not satisfactory, first-calf heifers need to be gaining body weight. 

The amount of supplement needed for mature cows and first-calf heifers to maintain or gain weight is presented in Table 1. Mature cows would need to be fed 1.4 to 3.4 lb/day of a supplement to maintain body weight, and first-calf heifers would need to be fed 5.4 to 6.6 lb/day of a supplement to gain 1 lb/day. These calculations are based on 1300-lb mature cow weight consuming hay with 57% TDN and supplement with 80% TDN, and assuming protein requirements are met. Typical TDN values of common feedstuffs used in supplements such as soybean hulls (74%), wheat midds (75%), dried distiller’s grains (88%), and corn (88%) straddle this value and can be used to create a supplement. 

Figure 1. The percentage of cows displaying estrous at 7-day intervals following calving for groups that lost body condition or maintained body condition after calving. Adapted from Rutter and Randel (1984). 

Herd Health: Reproduction

Pregnancy rates and calving season timing are really important factors for success in beef cow-calf herds. To learn more about pregnancy rates and calving season timing tune in to this episode of Herd Health with Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White to hear what they have to say about Bob’s favorite topic reproduction.

To read more:
Herd Level Factors Associated with Pregnancy Success and Distribution in Beef Cow-Calf Herds
No Evidence for a Negative Association Between Bovine Leukemia Virus Status and Fertility in Kansas Beef Herds: a Cross-Sectional Study

Post Calving, Cattle on Feed, Calving Season Questions

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

1:56 Post Calving

11:11 Cattle on Feed Up 4% in Kansas: What Does It Mean for You?

15:43 Calving Season Questions

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Feeding Times for Calving Cows, Economic Questions, Electrolytes for Scouring Calves

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat!  Please click on any links below to be taken to sources mentioned in the podcast. Keep an eye out for news regarding the podcast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

2:11 Listener Question: Feeding Times for Calving Cows

7:24 Economic Questions

16:10 Electrolytes for Scouring Calves

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Euthanasia of Cattle 

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

While veterinarians and cattle producers work long and hard hours to protect the health of the cattle in their care, sometimes euthanizing an animal is the best way to protect cattle welfare. A decision to euthanize an animal is based on the level of pain or distress of the animal, how likely the animal is to recover and the length of time required to recover if treated, the ability to get to feed and water, the likelihood that the animal would be condemned if presented for slaughter, and the potential for important diagnostic information to be gained that would protect the health of other animals or humans.  Conditions that may indicate that euthanasia is appropriate to protect animal welfare includes situations when an animal has a severe injury such as a fracture that prevents them from standing, situations when the animal has poor quality of life due to advanced age or disease (particularly with a low likelihood of recovery), disease conditions with no effective treatment or that produce a high level of pain that cannot be managed, diseases for which the treatment would result in extended drug withdrawal time until clearance of tissue residue, or diseases such as rabies that involve a significant threat to human health.   

The goal of euthanasia, as described by the American Veterinary Medical Association is to use “a method of killing that minimizes pain, distress, and anxiety experienced by the animal prior to loss of consciousness, and causes rapid loss of consciousness followed by cardiac or respiratory arrest and death”. Basically, euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of an ill or debilitated animal in as painless and low-stress manner as possible. Each approved method of euthanasia will either involve direct destruction of brain tissue (gunshot, penetrating captive bolt), rapid onset of unconsciousness (non-penetrating captive bolt or anesthetic drug) followed by cutting a major artery to remove oxygen-carrying blood, or use of a drug (barbiturates) that directly depresses the brain which leads to death by the stoppage of breathing. Because cattle are large and euthanasia options, by their definition, have the ability to end life, human safety is a primary concern when selecting a method of euthanasia. 

Several of these euthanasia techniques require that the animal be restrained in a squeeze chute or in a similar manner; if restraint is not possible, it is likely that only gunshot to the head is practically possible, and it requires specialized skill and training. If performed skillfully, gunshot induces unconsciousness instantly and does not require close contact with the animal (2 to 10 inches from the head). However, this method should only be attempted by individuals trained in the use of firearms and the proper location of the point of impact for euthanasia, and who understand the potential for ricochet. Care must be taken to minimize danger to the shooter, to bystanders, and to other animals. In addition, the shooter should be aware of local ordinances that may prohibit the discharge of firearms in some locations.  

Captive bolt “guns” are placed firmly against the skull (training is required to identify the correct location) of a restrained or sedated animal. The bolt is either penetrating or non-penetrating depending on the gun type. Both types (penetrating and non-penetrating) will consistently cause stunning of an animal. A stunned animal will “drop” but will still exhibit respiration and sudden quick limb movements. These movements may be misinterpreted as a response to pain by a person inexperienced with euthanasia. An additional procedure such as cutting a major artery such as one or both carotid arteries in the neck, the major arteries located under the front legs, or the aorta to allow the animal to bleed-out or injecting a chemical agent to stop breathing must be used to ensure death after the use of the non-penetrating captive bolt and is recommended after use of the penetrating captive bolt. The captive bolt method may not be appropriate if the euthanasia will be observed by people not trained in the method.  

Injecting an overdoses of a barbiturate drug into a large vein is an effective method of euthanasia, but requires a special veterinary license. When properly administered, barbiturate overdose produces rapid unconsciousness followed by slowing and then stopping of breathing and a heartbeat. This method is particularly appropriate if untrained people will be observing the euthanasia because of the minimal movement of the animal after injection, or if the animal is being euthanized because of concern that the animal may have rabies. In order to test for this important disease that can affect humans, the brain must sent to a diagnostic laboratory and euthanasia methods that destroy the brain (gunshot and captive bolt) cannot be used. One drawback to this method of euthanasia is that carcass disposal options may be reduced. Because tissue residues of the barbiturate can be high, renderers may not accept the carcass and if disposal methods such as composting or shallow burial allow scavengers to gain access to the carcass, unintended animals or birds (some which are protected by federal or state law) may be killed. Remaining options for carcass disposal are limited by state and federal regulations, but may include deep burial or incineration.  

Euthanasia of an animal that is suffering from irreversible disease or injury is a primary responsibility for cattle producers and veterinarians. While an important component of animal care, this practice is not simple because potential methods of euthanasia each have their limitations. Cattle producers will occasionally be confronted with ill or debilitated animals that should be humanely euthanized. This important task should be done by people with the skills and training to maintain human safety as well as to ensure a quick and painless death of the animal. 

More information available from: Practical Euthanasia of Cattle: Considerations for the Producer, Livestock Market Operator, Livestock Transporter, and Veterinarian. Prepared by the Animal Welfare Committee of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners (available in both English and Spanish). http://aabp.org/about/AABP_Guidelines.asp