After the Abstract: Training Program & Antimicrobial Drug Usage

Join Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White as they discuss a paper looking at Effect of a dairy farmworker stewardship training program on antimicrobial drug usage in dairy cows.

View the full paper here

After the Abstract is recorded with the goal of assisting veterinarians in the interpretation of scientific literature.  This podcast is not an endorsement of specific practices and medical decisions should only be made in consultation with your veterinarian.

Bull BSE, Economic Questions, Research Roundup: Metaphylaxis

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode the experts discuss what do when a bull doesn’t pass a bull BSE and answer some economic questions. Guest Dannell Kopp also discuss her research about metaphylaxis.

Guest: Dannell Kopp, Graduate and Veterinary Student

2:21 Bull BSE

10:47 Economic Questions

14:00 Research Roundup: Metaphylaxis

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Forage Utilization

Join Dr. Philip Lancaster and Dr. Brad White as they discuss how to get more grazing days and how to be more efficient with the forage you have available. Tune in to this episode of Bovine Science with BCI to learn more.

Cow Depreciation, Farm Safety, Bull Selection

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode guest Bob Weaber joins the crew to discuss cow depreciation and is it a big deal or no; farm safety and OSHA; and answer a listener question about bull selection.

Guest: Bob Weaber, Department Head Eastern Kansas Research and Extension Centers 

3:45 Cow Depreciation: A Big Deal or No?

13:12 Farm Safety and OSHA

19:15 Listener Question: Bull Selection

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Pre-Weaning Disease in Herds

It’s spring! For a spring calving herd its full optimism. New calves on the ground getting ready to start growing and thriving; until pre-weaning disease hits. Find out on this episode of Herd Health with Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White to learn more. 

To read more: 
Improving Beef Calf Health
Biosecurity Practices in Western Canadian Cow-Calf Herds and their Association with Animal Health

Vertically Coordinated Beef, How to Decrease Cost on my Operation, Usefulness of Annual Vaccinations

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode guest Dr. Jason Warner joins the crew to discuss vertically coordinated beef supply chains, how to decrease cost on your operations and usefulness of annual vaccinations.

Guest: Dr. Jason Warner, K-State Cow-Calf Specialist  

4:04 Listener Question: Vertically Coordinated Beef Supply Chain

10:54 How to Decrease Cost on my Operations?

15:51 Listener Question: Usefulness of Annual Vaccinations

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Organic Mineral Sources can Improve Health and Performance of Stressed Calves

Phillip Lancaster, MS, PhD
Ruminant nutritionist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
palancaster@vet.k-state.edu 

Weaning, shipping, and commingling are some of the greatest stressors for calves during the beef production chain. Feedlots and stocker operations know all too well the impact these stressors have on animal health and performance. Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex is strongly associated with these stressors leading to increased morbidity and decreased feed intake and growth. 

Stress and the ensuing increase in the stress hormone cortisol have negative effects on immune function and the ability of calves to combat BRD pathogens. Calves undergoing stress during weaning and shipping to a new location have elevated cortisol levels resulting in immunosuppression. 

The immune system requires energy, protein, vitamins, and minerals to function properly, but newly arrived calves usually have depressed feed intake resulting in less than adequate consumption of nutrients. Less is known about the mineral requirements of stressed beef calves and the impact of previous mineral nutrition and current mineral status have on the response of the immune system to BRD pathogens. Minerals naturally found in feeds are part of the feed matrix and generally complexed with organic molecules such as proteins. Mineral supplementation is generally in the form of oxides, sulfates, and chlorides termed inorganic minerals, which generally have lower bioavailability than organic minerals. In the last 30 years, supplements with minerals complexed to an organic molecule, often an amino acid, have become commercially available. These organic minerals may enhance health and performance of cattle by increasing availability and functionality of the mineral in the animal’s body.

A recent study evaluated the use of organic versus inorganic minerals in a diet for stressed calves. The organic mineral diet contained zinc, copper, manganese, and cobalt complexed with an amino acid whereas the inorganic mineral diet contained sulfate forms of these minerals. Heifers were sourced from several sale barns over a 3-day period and commingled, and considered to be high-risk for BRD. Calves were fed bermudagrass hay free choice and a grain supplement at 3 lb/hd/day. The overall morbidity was 52% with heifers fed the organic mineral at 46% compared with 58% for the inorganic mineral. There was no difference between forms of mineral in the number of cattle retreated for BRD. Additionally, heifers fed the organic mineral gained 1.72 lb/d compared with 1.54 lb/d for the inorganic mineral. 

This level of improvement in health and performance is not always evident in research studies comparing organic and inorganic mineral sources. A couple of important factors are the level of BRD morbidity overall and the mineral status of calves at arrival to the feedlot or stocker operation. In the study discussed above, the level of morbidity was quite high with over 50% of the heifers being treated for BRD at least once, and 18% of the heifers were treated at least twice. Additionally, liver biopsies indicated that heifers were marginally deficient in copper, zinc, and manganese at arrival. Although it is difficult to determine mineral status at arrival and the level of BRD morbidity cannot be predicted, the use of organic minerals may be warranted in such situations, but the added expense of organic minerals is not always warranted.

Figure 1. Morbidity and average daily gain of heifers fed inorganic or organic mineral sources during a 42-day receiving period during the stocker phase. Adapted from Cheek et al. (2024; https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae056).

Tox Talk: 4 Dead Heifers

50 first-calf heifers out grazing in early spring still being fed hay every other day. All the heifers looked normal but the next day 4 heifers were dead. What happened? Tune into Tox Talk with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz to find out.

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Embryo Transfer, Economic Questions, Synchronization

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode guest Dr. Clay Breiner joins the crew to discuss embryo transfer and synchronization as well as answer some economics questions. This episode is sponsored by Cross Country Genetics.

We Want to Hear From You
The Beef Cattle Institute team would like to hear your thoughts about the Cattle Chat and Bovine Science with BCI podcasts. Specifically, we’d like to know what topics you’d like to hear about on future Cattle Chat episodes and how the Beef Cattle Institute can provide educational information that is relevant to your operation’s goals. Please take this short survey by following this link:  https://kstate.ag/bci-survey

Guest: Dr. Clay Breiner, Cross Country Genetics

3:21 Listener Question: Embryo Transfer

9:20 Economic Questions

14:17 Listener Question: Synchronization

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Twitter at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Innovations in Animal Health 

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Innovations in cattle husbandry and health have been taking place since cattle were first domesticated for human use. For many centuries, our understanding of cattle health and productivity were only based on observations; and innovations were few and far between. The rapid changes in cattle health and productivity witnessed in the last 150 years have been made possible by increased use of carefully designed experiments and the adoption of the scientific method in the early parts of the 20th century.  

Modern animal husbandry and health is based on a combination of art and science. The “art” component of cattle husbandry involves the practice of observing well. Innovations often come as a direct result of observing cattle over time and in many situations to become familiar with the range of behaviors that are normal, and being able to compare those cattle to others that exhibit different behaviors. The “science” component of cattle husbandry builds on the art of observing well, but then it goes further. It carefully measures not only the outcome of interest, but also other potentially biasing or confounding inputs so that important factors that change the risk of disease are not confused with other factors that don’t impact health or productivity.  

The United States has benefited tremendously from the establishment of Land Grant Universities starting in 1863. This innovation in higher education provided university professors with experiment stations to undertake practical agricultural research. The development of the Extension Service greatly increased the impact of plentiful applied research with the mission to promote research findings to farmers and ranchers. The Land Grant mission allowed for practical agricultural research to take place in every state of the union, and it came about just as the science world was learning how to do high-quality experiments that could identify subtle improvements while clearing away the clutter of variation due to weather, soil types, animal differences, and other factors that may or may not be important for a particular question. In addition, over the past 150 years, numerous animal health companies have developed extensive research facilities which add substantially to the number and types of innovations in agriculture.  

Some of the most important innovations in cattle health have come about in the areas of: vaccine development against common disease-causing viruses and bacteria, improved diagnostic tests to identify infectious agents and toxins associated with diseases of cattle, genetic tests to identify carriers of undesirable traits, antibiotics to treat and prevent diseases caused by bacteria, and chemicals to kill parasites such as worms, lice, scabies mites, and flies. In addition, innovative methods to use biosecurity principles such as quarantine, age-segregation, and sanitation have led to important improvements in animal health and productivity.  

The development of a systematic breeding soundness examination to evaluate bull fertility by combining a thorough examination of the bull’s overall health with a microscopic examination of semen and a thorough examination of the reproductive tract was an important innovation to minimize the risk of reproductive failure. Similarly, methods to accurately identify pregnant cows and to estimate the fetal age in order to predict breeding and calving dates has been one of the most important innovations to impact reproductive efficiency and herd productivity.  

Predictions of the impact of mating decisions on the performance of calves based on the performance of potential sires and dams, and their relatives (e.g. Expected Progeny Difference) has allowed rapid genetic improvement for many economically important production and reproductive traits. These tools to impact animal selection as well as other innovations in grazing management, forage supplementation, development of high-concentrate diets, and creation of growth promoters have increased beef production on diminishingly available agricultural land in the U.S.  

Even as the innovations of the past 150 years are celebrated for their impacts on the health and productivity of beef cattle, the potential for future innovations holds equal promise. Some of the innovations we may see in the near future include: genetic markers for animals with particularly good (or poor) immunity to disease, genetic markers for highly fertile bulls and heifers, improvements in vaccine, parasite control, and antimicrobial products, and increased use of biosecurity tools such as carefully controlled herd/pen size, age-segregation, treatments to clear cattle that are persistent carriers of infectious agents, and quick, chute-side diagnostic tests for many disease agents and production characteristics. 

No discussion of innovation would be complete without an acknowledgement that not all innovations stood the test of time. Some reasons that exciting innovations are introduced only to quickly fade away include: other factors playing a bigger role in disease or production than the one we are targeting with innovative technologies or management, microorganism adapting to the pressure of new technologies and becoming much less susceptible to a promising innovation, side-effects such as toxicities or unforeseen consequences outweighing the benefits of the innovation, or changes in management (human behavior) that reduce existing problems while leading to the emergence of new problems.  

The causes of disease and production limitations are very complex. New knowledge and innovations can allow veterinarians, cattle producers, and researchers to attack some of these causes to limit the extent or timing of negative effects, but it is highly unlikely that we will ever be able to reduce the effect of all negative factors simultaneously. However, looking at the history of innovations in the cattle industry as a guide, if we maintain a holistic view to create and maintain a sanitary environment, balance nutrients as needed, reduce stress, and identify and remove disease reservoirs where possible, we have reason to be certain that more exciting innovations are in our future.  

After the Abstract: Lameness in Feedlot Cattle

Join Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White as they discuss a paper looking at Economic Impacts of Lameness in Feedlot Cattle.

View the full paper here

After the Abstract is recorded with the goal of assisting veterinarians in the interpretation of scientific literature.  This podcast is not an endorsement of specific practices and medical decisions should only be made in consultation with your veterinarian.