Tariffs, Clostridial Diseases, Beef Quality Assurance

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! For Dr. Brian Lubbers last episode as a host he shares information on clostridial diseases and the value of getting Beef Quality Assurance certified. Dr. Dustin Pendell also gives a breakdown on tariffs. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:23 Tariffs

11:19 Clostridial Diseases

16:30 Beef Quality Assurance
bqa.org

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Replacing distillers grains with corn: Does it impact cattle performance?

By Phillip Lancaster

In the last decade corn ethanol co-products have replaced a large portion of corn in diets of growing and finishing cattle due to availability and price. However, the price of corn has decreased considerably in the last year making it a cost-effective feedstuff in cattle diets again. A recent study evaluated replacing modified distillers grains with solubles with dry rolled corn in high roughage growing diets. Additionally, the study compared brome hay: sorghum silage with baled corn stalks as the forage source in the diet.

The study used 120 individually-fed steers weighing 620 lb at the start of the study. The steers were fed for 84 days and growth, feed intake and feed efficiency were measured. The diets consisted of 56% forage, 40% a combination of distillers grains and dry rolled corn, and 4% supplement. The main part of the study was to evaluate replacement of modified wet distillers grains with dry rolled corn. There were 4 diets with modified distllers grains at 40, 32, 24, and 16% of the diet dry matter. Dry rolled corn was then included at 0, 8, 16, and 24% of the diet dry matter. As distillers grains decreased in the diet and dry rolled corn increased, there was a linear decrease in gain and feed efficiency such that steers on all diets at the same amount of feed but gained differently (Figure 1).

A probable reason for the decreased gain of steers fed more dry rolled corn could be the decrease in protein in the diet. The protein was 17, 15, 13, and 12% for diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% distillers grains. In the diets with 24 and 16% distillers grains, urea was added to maintain protein levels at 12%. All diets were evaluated using a nutrition model and results indicated that all diets met requirements for metabolizable protein; however, true protein from distillers grains and microbial protein synthesis from urea may not have been equivalent.

The second part of the study was to evaluate brome hay: sorghum silage versus corn stalks as the forage source in the diet. The brome hay: sorghum silage had crude protein of 7.8%, neutral detergent fiber of 67% and digestibility of 54% compared to 4.0%, 77%, and 49% for the corn stalks indicating that the corn stalks were of lesser nutritional value. The corn stalks were included at 56% of the diet dry matter; the same as the brome hay: sorghum silage such that diets with corn stalks likely had lesser net energy for gain values. Steers fed corn stalks gain 1.76 lb/day compared to 2.89 lb/day for steers fed brome hay: sorghum silage. Interestingly, feed efficiency was the same between forage sources indicating that the lesser gain of steers fed corn stalks was due to lesser feed intake, and not necessarily lesser digestibility of the diet.

In conclusion, when dry rolled corn replaces large amounts of modified distillers grains in forage-based growing diets, a true protein source like soybean meal may need to be added to the diet. Replacing brome hay:sorghum silage with corn stalks may decrease feed intake and growth in backgrounding diets.

Figure 1. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) of steers fed diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% modified distillers grains (DGS) and 0, 8, 16, and 24% dry rolled corn (DRC). Adapted from Ferrari et al. (2024;  10.15232/aas.2024-02551). 

Pasture Pulse: Hardware Disease

Introducing the newest edition of Bovine Science, Pasture Pulse. For this edition Dr. Brad White is joined by Dr. Matt Miesner to discuss cattle health cases. On this episode a cow appears sick shortly after having the calf, but the cause is not easy to identify. Thanks for listening.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hardware Disease

Indications for and factors relating to outcome after rumenotomy or rumenostomy in cattle: 95 cases (1999–2011)

Grazing Strategies, Listener Question: Rash, Research Update

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses pros and cons of rotational grazing. The experts then take a listener question about a mysterious rash on their herd. Finally Dr. Conrad Schelkof gives a research update. Thanks for tuning in!

3:18 Continuous vs. Rotational Grazing

12:10 Listener Question: Rash or Herpes?

18:45 Conrad Schelkopf Research Update

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Poisoned Heifer

When this producer goes to move his heifers he finds one dead and others ill. With no obvious clues, what caused the heifer to die and could this happen to the others? Find out on this episode of Tox Talk a Bovine Science Podcast with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Sustainability, Health Metrics, Ranells Ranch

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Logan Thompson, KSU Sustainable Livestock Extension Specialist, to discus sustainability in the beef industry. The experts will also discuss what health metrics producers should be keeping track of for their herd. Dr. Thompson finishes the episode by talking about some of the current research he is working on.

3:56 State of Sustainability

11:19 Health Metrics

17:26 Ranells Ranch Research

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: Nasal Pathobiome Abundance

On this episode of After the Abstract Dr. Brian Lubbers brings in a hefty research paper which aims to compare nasal microbiome community diversity and composition. Drs. Lubbers and White discuss the implications of these findings, considering how nasal microbiome profiling could enhance BRD diagnostics and inform targeted interventions. Thanks for listening!

Article Discussed: Nasal pathobiont abundance is a moderate feedlot-dependent indicator of bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle

Drought, Pour-on, Innovation

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the experts begin by discussing Dr. Lancaster’s new research on drought decisions. Next they answer a listener question about applying pour-on to cows. Finally they discuss new innovations and speculate about the future of the beef industry.

2:46 Drought Decisions

11:29 Listener Question: Pour-on

16:29 Innovations in the Beef Industry

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Pasture Management – Toxic Plant Considerations

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Cattlemen throughout history have known that some plants can be toxic to their animals. Some poisonous plants are only present in a few small areas of the U.S. while others are found over a wide geographic area. Some of these plants are poisonous during all phases of growth, while others are only poisonous (or more dangerous) during certain stages of growth or at certain times of the year.

Plants that cause damage to the heart or lungs will generally cause a very rapid death if a large enough dose is eaten – but if the amount consumed is less than a lethal dose, cattle may appear weak and depressed. Plants that are toxic to the liver or kidney seldom cause a rapid death, but instead a slow decline in health and body condition. Consuming plants that cause damage to the liver can result in the buildup of toxins that would normally be removed by a healthy liver. These toxins can cause the skin to become very sensitive to sunburn and can cause other signs of liver failure such as weight loss and poor performance. Some plants are toxic to the kidney – particularly plants such as oak trees that accumulate tannins. Cattle with kidney damage may show signs of reduced appetite, rapid weight loss, and increased water intake.

Some plants are toxic to the nervous system such as some types of ryegrass, locoweeds, and water hemlock. Cattle that eat these plants may suffer from rapid death or longer-term weight loss and nervous system signs depending on the specific plant and the amount consumed. Signs of nervous system problems include staggering, apparent blindness, exaggerated movements, and hyper-excitability.

Abortion or the development of birth defects can occur when pregnant cattle consume certain toxic plants. Abortions caused by toxic plants are often difficult to diagnose, and the birth defects caused by some toxic plants are the same or similar to defects caused by genetic problems or viral infection. Loco weeds, tobacco, lupine, and poison hemlock are known to cause birth defects in calves in certain situations when pregnant cows consume these plants.

In order to diagnose suspected plant poisonings you should work with your veterinarian and a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. Your veterinarian can help you to develop an accurate history and time-line for the problem. To identify the cause of losses due to poisonous plants, the pasture or pen should be inspected, both alive and dead animals should be examined, and diagnostic samples of plants, blood, and tissues should be properly collected and then evaluated by trained diagnostic laboratory personnel. The presence of toxic plants in pastures or hays is not proof that cattle have been harmed by the plants because many time cattle will refuse to eat them. However, finding evidence of consumption of potentially toxic plants by animals, either by observing evidence of grazing of suspected plants or by finding parts of these plants in the digestive tract of a dead animal is highly suggestive of poisonings.

Because removing all toxic plants from a range or pasture is not likely to be practical or successful, good grazing management using stocking density, fencing, water development and salt/supplement placement to maintain good pasture health will

minimize the incentive for cattle to graze toxic plants. If it appears that a toxic plant problem is occurring, cattle should be removed from the suspected pasture immediately and a veterinarian should be contacted. It is important to work with veterinarians, Extension agents, natural resource conservation service specialists, and range specialists who can all help develop a plan to keep pastures healthy and minimize the risk of toxic plant poisonings.

Diving into Diets: Feed Digestibility

In this episode our hosts discuss the affects of pregnancy on digestion in beef cattle. They look at passage rate and extent of digestibility. Dr. Lancaster brings and article out of Brazil that studies these aspects.

Article discussed: Pregnancy affects maternal performance, feed intake, and digestion kinetics parameters in beef heifers

Research Update, Scorecards, Marketing

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Jason Warner, KSU Extension Cow-Calf Specialist and PhD student Maddie Mancke to discuss Maddie’s research on heat stress. Dr. Warner also gives some advice on filling out calving scorecards to evaluate the calving season. Finally Dr. Dustin Pendell gives some tips on marketing your cow-calf herd.

3:11 Research Update: Heat Stress

11:28 Calving Scorecard

17:35 Marketing Tips  

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!