Dead cattle have value too

No matter how well you take care of your cattle, some calves, yearling age animals, and even adults will die. Although a financial loss, these animals can be very valuable to your farm or ranch to help evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your health program and to provide information to your veterinarian to minimize future disease risk.

The term used to describe the thorough examination of a dead animal is necropsy. A veterinarian often uses a necropsy to determine the cause of death in the animal that died and more importantly, to determine if the rest of the herd is at-risk and if management changes need to be made to protect the herd.

It is important that the veterinarian start the necropsy with an open mind and to avoid having a preconceived diagnosis. There are also important tools that are needed for a proper necropsy including: sharp knives and other cutting instruments, bags to store samples, and appropriate cleansers and disinfectants to make sure that disease-causing germs cannot be spread to other animals.

A veterinarian starts the necropsy by getting a good history of the group or herd including the age, sex, and weight of the affected animals, how long the animal had been sick before death, and where the animal died and its position at death. In addition the veterinarian will determine what the herd or group has been eating and where it has been housed and if there is excessive mud, dust, or crowding. It is important to observe and possibly collect blood or other samples from healthy animals in the group, or from sick animals that show the same symptoms as the animals that died. Only after getting a good history and evaluating the environment will the veterinarian start to examine the dead animal by getting a general assessment of whether the animal appeared unthrifty prior to death and if there is evidence of swelling, fractures, wounds, or discharges from any body opening.

The veterinarian will then use a large knife to open the animal and begin a methodical examination of the body organs starting in the throat and chest by looking closely at the trachea and lungs and then the heart. Because pneumonia is a common threat to cattle, the location and type of any lung damage is noted. Joints such as the shoulder, hip, stifle, and hock are examined for evidence of abnormalities. The abdomen is then opened and the rumen and intestine and other organs are examined carefully. If the animal had symptoms indicating nervous system involvement, the brain and possibly spinal cord would be removed and examined.

Many times necropsies will include taking tissue and fluid samples and sending them to a diagnostic laboratory to be examined under a microscope or to be cultured to identify viruses or bacteria that may have contributed to the disease and death. Only samples taken from freshly dead animals and animals that died early in the disease process (preferably before being treated) are good candidates for sample submission for viral or bacterial culture. This is because in cases of pneumonia and other diseases, important viral populations can be cleared before death and bacterial populations can change so that later invaders can overgrowth the initial disease-causing bacteria, which can give misleading information about the type of virus or bacteria that were involved with the disease in its early stages.

Necropsies are not always successful at identifying the exact cause of death, but they are almost always helpful at identifying which possible diseases are not involved and for identifying which organs are healthy and which are diseased. Even if a diagnosis is not made, an important purpose of necropsies is to make sure that rare but dangerous diseases are not present on the farm or that common and easily diagnosed diseases are not a factor in the current problem.

To capture the most value for necropsies on your animals, you and your veterinarian should keep records so that trends or changes can be identified. The value of a single necropsy is not merely whether or not a diagnosis for that animal is made, but the value is based on the accumulation of evidence used to determine the level of health of the herd and if that level of health is changing. Necropsies are used extensively in evaluating the health status of all types of livestock herds and to aid in the diagnosis and control of disease. From a health standpoint, the most valuable animal on your farm or ranch may be the one that just died.

Finally, once the necropsy is completed, all the equipment used must be cleaned and disinfected and the coveralls, boots, and gloves worn by the veterinarian must be cleaned and disinfected or thrown away. In addition, the carcass of an animal that is necropsied must be disposed of properly. Each state has published rules about the disposal of dead livestock. Rendering, burial, composting, or burning are the most common means of disposal. If you are responsible for disposing of the body, be sure that you are in compliance with the law and that the dead animal is not a continued source of infection to other animals.

Diving into Diets: Sorghum Silage

In this episode of Bovine Science, we delve into the intricacies of sorghum silage processing and its impact on beef heifer nutrition. Our discussion centers around the recent study published in the Journal of Animal Science titled “Evaluation of kernel processing and processor type in whole-plant sorghum silage: effects on nutrient digestibility and animal performance in backgrounding beef heifers” (https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae369).

Tariffs, Clostridial Diseases, Beef Quality Assurance

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! For Dr. Brian Lubbers last episode as a host he shares information on clostridial diseases and the value of getting Beef Quality Assurance certified. Dr. Dustin Pendell also gives a breakdown on tariffs. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:23 Tariffs

11:19 Clostridial Diseases

16:30 Beef Quality Assurance
bqa.org

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Replacing distillers grains with corn: Does it impact cattle performance?

By Phillip Lancaster

In the last decade corn ethanol co-products have replaced a large portion of corn in diets of growing and finishing cattle due to availability and price. However, the price of corn has decreased considerably in the last year making it a cost-effective feedstuff in cattle diets again. A recent study evaluated replacing modified distillers grains with solubles with dry rolled corn in high roughage growing diets. Additionally, the study compared brome hay: sorghum silage with baled corn stalks as the forage source in the diet.

The study used 120 individually-fed steers weighing 620 lb at the start of the study. The steers were fed for 84 days and growth, feed intake and feed efficiency were measured. The diets consisted of 56% forage, 40% a combination of distillers grains and dry rolled corn, and 4% supplement. The main part of the study was to evaluate replacement of modified wet distillers grains with dry rolled corn. There were 4 diets with modified distllers grains at 40, 32, 24, and 16% of the diet dry matter. Dry rolled corn was then included at 0, 8, 16, and 24% of the diet dry matter. As distillers grains decreased in the diet and dry rolled corn increased, there was a linear decrease in gain and feed efficiency such that steers on all diets at the same amount of feed but gained differently (Figure 1).

A probable reason for the decreased gain of steers fed more dry rolled corn could be the decrease in protein in the diet. The protein was 17, 15, 13, and 12% for diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% distillers grains. In the diets with 24 and 16% distillers grains, urea was added to maintain protein levels at 12%. All diets were evaluated using a nutrition model and results indicated that all diets met requirements for metabolizable protein; however, true protein from distillers grains and microbial protein synthesis from urea may not have been equivalent.

The second part of the study was to evaluate brome hay: sorghum silage versus corn stalks as the forage source in the diet. The brome hay: sorghum silage had crude protein of 7.8%, neutral detergent fiber of 67% and digestibility of 54% compared to 4.0%, 77%, and 49% for the corn stalks indicating that the corn stalks were of lesser nutritional value. The corn stalks were included at 56% of the diet dry matter; the same as the brome hay: sorghum silage such that diets with corn stalks likely had lesser net energy for gain values. Steers fed corn stalks gain 1.76 lb/day compared to 2.89 lb/day for steers fed brome hay: sorghum silage. Interestingly, feed efficiency was the same between forage sources indicating that the lesser gain of steers fed corn stalks was due to lesser feed intake, and not necessarily lesser digestibility of the diet.

In conclusion, when dry rolled corn replaces large amounts of modified distillers grains in forage-based growing diets, a true protein source like soybean meal may need to be added to the diet. Replacing brome hay:sorghum silage with corn stalks may decrease feed intake and growth in backgrounding diets.

Figure 1. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) of steers fed diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% modified distillers grains (DGS) and 0, 8, 16, and 24% dry rolled corn (DRC). Adapted from Ferrari et al. (2024;  10.15232/aas.2024-02551). 

Pasture Pulse: Hardware Disease

Introducing the newest edition of Bovine Science, Pasture Pulse. For this edition Dr. Brad White is joined by Dr. Matt Miesner to discuss cattle health cases. On this episode a cow appears sick shortly after having the calf, but the cause is not easy to identify. Thanks for listening.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hardware Disease

Indications for and factors relating to outcome after rumenotomy or rumenostomy in cattle: 95 cases (1999–2011)

Grazing Strategies, Listener Question: Rash, Research Update

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses pros and cons of rotational grazing. The experts then take a listener question about a mysterious rash on their herd. Finally Dr. Conrad Schelkof gives a research update. Thanks for tuning in!

3:18 Continuous vs. Rotational Grazing

12:10 Listener Question: Rash or Herpes?

18:45 Conrad Schelkopf Research Update

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Poisoned Heifer

When this producer goes to move his heifers he finds one dead and others ill. With no obvious clues, what caused the heifer to die and could this happen to the others? Find out on this episode of Tox Talk a Bovine Science Podcast with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Sustainability, Health Metrics, Ranells Ranch

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Logan Thompson, KSU Sustainable Livestock Extension Specialist, to discus sustainability in the beef industry. The experts will also discuss what health metrics producers should be keeping track of for their herd. Dr. Thompson finishes the episode by talking about some of the current research he is working on.

3:56 State of Sustainability

11:19 Health Metrics

17:26 Ranells Ranch Research

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: Nasal Pathobiome Abundance

On this episode of After the Abstract Dr. Brian Lubbers brings in a hefty research paper which aims to compare nasal microbiome community diversity and composition. Drs. Lubbers and White discuss the implications of these findings, considering how nasal microbiome profiling could enhance BRD diagnostics and inform targeted interventions. Thanks for listening!

Article Discussed: Nasal pathobiont abundance is a moderate feedlot-dependent indicator of bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle

Drought, Pour-on, Innovation

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the experts begin by discussing Dr. Lancaster’s new research on drought decisions. Next they answer a listener question about applying pour-on to cows. Finally they discuss new innovations and speculate about the future of the beef industry.

2:46 Drought Decisions

11:29 Listener Question: Pour-on

16:29 Innovations in the Beef Industry

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Pasture Management – Toxic Plant Considerations

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Cattlemen throughout history have known that some plants can be toxic to their animals. Some poisonous plants are only present in a few small areas of the U.S. while others are found over a wide geographic area. Some of these plants are poisonous during all phases of growth, while others are only poisonous (or more dangerous) during certain stages of growth or at certain times of the year.

Plants that cause damage to the heart or lungs will generally cause a very rapid death if a large enough dose is eaten – but if the amount consumed is less than a lethal dose, cattle may appear weak and depressed. Plants that are toxic to the liver or kidney seldom cause a rapid death, but instead a slow decline in health and body condition. Consuming plants that cause damage to the liver can result in the buildup of toxins that would normally be removed by a healthy liver. These toxins can cause the skin to become very sensitive to sunburn and can cause other signs of liver failure such as weight loss and poor performance. Some plants are toxic to the kidney – particularly plants such as oak trees that accumulate tannins. Cattle with kidney damage may show signs of reduced appetite, rapid weight loss, and increased water intake.

Some plants are toxic to the nervous system such as some types of ryegrass, locoweeds, and water hemlock. Cattle that eat these plants may suffer from rapid death or longer-term weight loss and nervous system signs depending on the specific plant and the amount consumed. Signs of nervous system problems include staggering, apparent blindness, exaggerated movements, and hyper-excitability.

Abortion or the development of birth defects can occur when pregnant cattle consume certain toxic plants. Abortions caused by toxic plants are often difficult to diagnose, and the birth defects caused by some toxic plants are the same or similar to defects caused by genetic problems or viral infection. Loco weeds, tobacco, lupine, and poison hemlock are known to cause birth defects in calves in certain situations when pregnant cows consume these plants.

In order to diagnose suspected plant poisonings you should work with your veterinarian and a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. Your veterinarian can help you to develop an accurate history and time-line for the problem. To identify the cause of losses due to poisonous plants, the pasture or pen should be inspected, both alive and dead animals should be examined, and diagnostic samples of plants, blood, and tissues should be properly collected and then evaluated by trained diagnostic laboratory personnel. The presence of toxic plants in pastures or hays is not proof that cattle have been harmed by the plants because many time cattle will refuse to eat them. However, finding evidence of consumption of potentially toxic plants by animals, either by observing evidence of grazing of suspected plants or by finding parts of these plants in the digestive tract of a dead animal is highly suggestive of poisonings.

Because removing all toxic plants from a range or pasture is not likely to be practical or successful, good grazing management using stocking density, fencing, water development and salt/supplement placement to maintain good pasture health will

minimize the incentive for cattle to graze toxic plants. If it appears that a toxic plant problem is occurring, cattle should be removed from the suspected pasture immediately and a veterinarian should be contacted. It is important to work with veterinarians, Extension agents, natural resource conservation service specialists, and range specialists who can all help develop a plan to keep pastures healthy and minimize the risk of toxic plant poisonings.

Diving into Diets: Feed Digestibility

In this episode our hosts discuss the affects of pregnancy on digestion in beef cattle. They look at passage rate and extent of digestibility. Dr. Lancaster brings and article out of Brazil that studies these aspects.

Article discussed: Pregnancy affects maternal performance, feed intake, and digestion kinetics parameters in beef heifers

Research Update, Scorecards, Marketing

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Jason Warner, KSU Extension Cow-Calf Specialist and PhD student Maddie Mancke to discuss Maddie’s research on heat stress. Dr. Warner also gives some advice on filling out calving scorecards to evaluate the calving season. Finally Dr. Dustin Pendell gives some tips on marketing your cow-calf herd.

3:11 Research Update: Heat Stress

11:28 Calving Scorecard

17:35 Marketing Tips  

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Purebred Cows are Open

On this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Bob Larson brings a case study where a producer had only their purebred cattle open and not crossbred. Dr. Larson and Dr. Brad White will go through how they got to the bottom of this case. They will also look at what the producer can do to keep from having this problem again.

Input Costs, Pasture Turnout, Supplements

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Justin Waggoner, KSU Beef Extension Specialist, to dig into the big question: When input costs rise, where can you cut without hurting your herd or your bottom line? The experts will also tackle feeding mineral after turnout for the summer. Dr. Waggoner will wrap up the episode by sharing a little about his research regarding navigating the nutritional limitations of cool season grasses.

3:43 Input Costs

11:42 Pasture Turnout

15:37 Supplementation During Cool Season Grasses:

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Spring Turnout Gone Wrong

Four dead calves found in a pasture after being turned out for the spring. What caused it, and why were no cows affected? Find out on this episode of Tox Talk a Bovine Science Podcast with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Spring Cleaning

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode we are switching things up by answering a myriad of listener questions to get producers ready for the coming season. The experts will discuss prolapses, mastitis, grass tetany, bulls and more. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:18 Prolapses

7:20 Mastitis

11:53 Magnesium

17:32 Bull Management

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: Caprine Science

On this unique episode of Bovine Science Dr. Brian Lubbers brings a research paper studying mastitis in dairy goats. Listen as Dr. Lubbers and Dr. Brad White dissect this paper and reflect on the findings.

Article Discussed: Efficacy of two long-acting intramammary antimicrobials for curing subclinical mastitis due to non-aureus staphylococci in dairy goats

Facilities, Crossbreeding, Mineral

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode we are joined by Dr. A.J. Tarphoff, extension specialist at Kansas State University. The experts discuss investing in facilities and keeping them updated. Next, they answer a listener question about crossbreeding versus owning a purebred herd. Finally, Dr. Brad White asks the panel for their thoughts on giving mineral to your herd. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:14 Facilities

5:50 Crossbreeding

17:10 Mineral Supplementation

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Using fecal nutrient analysis to determine grazing cow supplementation

Determining nutritive value of grazed forage is difficult and producers generally make assumptions about when forage nutritive value is low enough to warrant supplementation. The assumptions are not always correct because forage nutritive value is dynamic depending upon climate conditions and grazing management. Thus, cows are sometimes over or under supplemented.

Fecal consistency can provide clues as to the nutritive value of forages. Cows grazing lush green forage in the spring generally have very loose feces indicating low concentrations of fiber and high concentrations of protein. In contrast, cows grazing dormant standing forage in the winter will have very firm and dry feces indicating high concentrations of fiber and low concentrations of protein. These two extremes are easy to identify that the cows with loose feces do not need supplementation and the cows with firm dry feces need protein supplementation, and maybe energy supplementation, which is more difficult to discern from visual observation of feces.

A more detailed evaluation of feces can provide more information leading to better supplementation strategies and timing. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a tool to quick determine the chemical composition of a feedstuff or a fecal sample. Chemical analysis of fecal samples for protein and digestibility using NIRS coupled with a simple nutrition model can improve supplementation strategies of grazing cattle. This can be done with the help of the Grazingland Animal Nutrition Laboratory.

A recent study evaluated the use of the NIRS and a nutrition model in a cow herd in west Texas. The study compared two NIRS calibration analyses: a U.S.-scale calibration and a west Texas calibration. The U.S.-scale calibration poorly predicted the forage protein, but the west Texas calibration prediction of protein was much better indicating that regional calibration may be necessary for accurate prediction. The west Texas calibration coupled with the nutrition model was moderately accurate and precise in predicting body condition score of the cows. Possibly more importantly, the west Texas calibration coupled with the nutrition model was able to estimate changes in body condition score over time.

Forage nutritive value would change before body condition score. Being able to monitor changes in forage nutritive value through fecal analysis coupled with the nutrition model prediction of body condition changes would allow implementation of supplement strategies before changes in body condition occur. In conclusion, fecal analysis can be useful in determining supplementation strategies, but care should be taken that the NIRS calibration matches the local conditions.

Figure 1. Observed and predicted body condition score of beef cows grazing in west Texas. Adapted from Tolleson et al. (2025; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2024.11.004)

Diving into Diets: Direct Fed Microbial

On this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Phillip Lancaster brings a research article studying the effects of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on digestibility. Dr. Brad White and Dr. Lancaster will discuss the results of this research as well as how it could help cows on forage.

Article Discussed: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf093

Adverse Drug Reactions

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Although most of the time when we administer a treatment, vaccine, or other product to cattle we expect a positive outcome; occasionally cattle will have an adverse drug reaction. Adverse reactions can occur following the use of injectable antibiotics, dewormers, vaccines, insecticides, vitamin preparations, anti-inflammatory preparations, as well as skin ointments and other classes of drugs.

Adverse drug reactions are defined as any unintended and undesirable response to a drug and can be somewhat grouped as to being “human error” or “random”. Human error is often suspected if a high percentage of a group of cattle have an adverse drug reaction. The error can be due to an improper dose, route of administration, or combination of drugs. Improper dose can occur when a dose that is safe for another species results in an unsafe dose for cattle. Also, certain diseases such as liver or kidney disease or old age can cause a normally safe dose to cause problems in some individuals.

The label of any veterinary product will include instruction on the route of administration. The route can be: by mouth, applied to the skin, or injected into a muscle (intramuscularly/IM), under the skin (subcutaneously/SQ), or into a blood vessel (intravenously/IV). If a drug or product is labeled for one route of administration but given by another route, dangerously high doses of the active ingredient or other components of the product can result. It is important to understand that a veterinary product contains more than the active ingredient – it will also contain ingredients to keep the product stable over time and over a range of temperatures and other factors; and some non-active ingredients can be toxic at high doses.

Drug interactions can occur when one or more drugs antagonize another drug making it either ineffective or even dangerous. This can occur when drugs that were not intended to be mixed are mixed together in a bottle or syringe. The active drugs or the additives may cause the antagonism. Drug interactions can also occur even if antagonistic drugs are not mixed before injection, but are injected into the same animal and interact within the animal to cause adverse reactions.

You can reduce the risk of human error causing adverse drug reactions by only using drugs that you are very familiar with and that you have been trained to use by your veterinarian. Also, never mix drugs together in a bottle or syringe unless directed by the label. And, avoid giving multiple drugs at the same time unless your veterinarian advises you that it is safe.

Adverse drug reactions can also be caused by random, unknown factors. These types of reactions usually only affect one or a few members of a herd or group, but can cause a cluster of affected animals due to similar genetic factors in related animals. These types of reactions are unrelated to the dose or normal effects of the drug; and they are probably impossible to prevent. The active ingredient or carriers and other additives may cause random effects such as allergic reactions.

Allergic drug reactions in cattle most commonly occur following an injection and result in fluid build up in the lungs. The animals have sudden and severe respiratory problems making it difficult for them to breath. This type of reaction is called an anaphylactic response and often results in death. Rapid treatment with epinephrine and supportive care may help some affected cattle to survive.

Because the risk of adverse drug reactions is always small but present. Cattle should be observed after being treated with any veterinary product and not allowed to immediately leave the sight and care of the producer or veterinarian. Careful and appropriate use of veterinary products and attention following treatment are necessary to minimize the risk and cost of adverse drug reactions.

Value in Open Cows, AIP, Crops

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode the experts dive into options producers have when faced with open cows. Next, they discuss acute interstitial pneumonia, Dr. Lubbers brings some new findings in research and the experts decide what could be coming in the future. Finally, Dr. Pendell answers a listener question which asks the amount of producers who have switched to growing row crops.

2:21 Open Cows: Loss or Treasure

10:58 Acute Interstitial Pneumonia

15:56 Listener Question: Crops

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Pregnancy Loss Factors

What causes 30-40% of pregnancies to not have a live calf? Dr. Bob Larson brings a research report article which summarizes a lot of information on pregnancy in beef cattle. Dr. Brad White and Dr. Larson will discuss new information that could be applicable when dealing with pregnancy loss in a herd.

Link to Article: Highlighting factors contributing to pregnancy loss in beef cattle

Research Update, Calving Window, AI and ET

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode the Jacob Schumacher is here to talk about his research on castration and pain. Next, Dr. Bob Larson answers a listener question regarding narrowing the calving window. Finally, the experts answer another listener question from a producer who wants to convert to a registered herd. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:13 Jacob Schumacher Research Update

9:34 Listener Question: Calving Window

17:40 Listener Question: ET vs. AI

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!