Beef-on-Dairy, Free Martin, Spring Pond Death

Black cow with white face in pond next to cedar tree.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team answers your listener questions. starting with a question on calf nutrition. Next, Bob Larson answers a question about sexed semen and free martins. Finally Scott Fritz answers a question on pond scum.

4:02 Beef-on-Dairy Nutrition

13:36 Sexed Semen Free Martin

18:08 Spring Pond Scum

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Ponderosa Pine

Three red and white cows in open green grass with row of trees behind them.

After a large snow storm 34 cows have aborted their calves. What caused this and how can it be prevented in the future? Find out on this episode of Tox Talk a Bovine Science Podcast with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

Ponderosa Pine: https://www.ars.usda.gov/pacific-west-area/logan-ut/poisonous-plant-research/docs/ponderosa-pine-pinus-ponderosa/
KSVDL Toxicology: https://ksvdl.org/laboratories/toxicology/

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Calf Pneumonia

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Pneumonia in young calves is an important contributor to death loss before weaning. Many veterinarians and cattle producers think of post-weaning respiratory disease (also known as Bovine Respiratory Disease or BRD) when they think about pneumonia in cattle; but calves can get pneumonia while they are still suckling their dams. Because the risk factors associated with pre-weaning respiratory disease differ from BRD in stocker and feedlot cattle (which is usually associated with commingling and transportation), our understanding of how to prevent and control BRD in post-weaned calves is not sufficient to address pneumonia in suckling calves.

Several studies investigating calf pneumonia have reported that an average of 3% to 11% of calves are expected to suffer from the disease each year. In addition, nearly 1.5% of calves will die from pneumonia before they reach the age of weaning; which makes it the second leading cause of pre-weaning death with only scours causing more losses. The most likely age for calves to be diagnosed with pneumonia is between 70 and 150 days of age.

Herds that have more cases of calf scours as well as herds that bring in nursing calves from outside herds to graft onto cows that lost their calves, and herds that creep-feed calves or synchronize cows appear to be more likely to have cases of pneumonia. Calves born after a difficult birth and calves that failed to consume enough colostrum have been shown to be at higher risk of getting sick and dying before reaching weaning age. Veterinarians indicated in a survey that weather, calving in confinement, failing to adequately vaccinate the herd, and nutritional deficiencies were also suspected for contributing to the risk of calf pneumonia.

Many times, the first sign that a herd has a problem is when a calf is found dead. Because death in young calves can also be caused by other diseases such as blackleg, digestive tract disease, or trauma, a veterinarian will probably need to examine the dead calf and may need to submit samples to a diagnostic laboratory to identify the cause of death. Calves that show signs of pneumonia such as rapid breathing, laying down and being reluctant to rise, and having a high temperature should be treated with an appropriate antibiotic after consulting with your veterinarian.

Vaccinating calves against viruses such as bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), and bacteria such as Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida may help prevent outbreaks of calf pneumonia or reduce the severity of disease, but we know that a young calf’s immune system is not able to respond as well to vaccinations as an older calf’s. Because even a calf with a good immune response can be overwhelmed by a large exposure to germs, a successful plan to prevent disease in young calves need to involve more than just vaccinations.

Herds that have the best calf health have a short calving season and few heifers and cows experiencing calving difficulty. In addition, they keep young calves away from mud and other calves as much as possible. Cows that calve in good body condition and that are on a good plane of nutrition are more likely to have healthy calves. The best disease-control strategy is to focus on having good overall health of the cows and calves by meeting the herd’s nutritional needs, providing a good environment, and timely use of vaccinations in the cows and calves. If calves are affected with pneumonia while suckling their dams on summer range, you should be prepared to recognize and treat cases as early as possible with appropriate antibiotics in order to minimize death losses.

Intake Regulation, VTPRK, Forage Utilization

Black steer with white face in dirt pen.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! For this episode the crew is joined by K-State beef systems extension specialist Emma Briggs to discuss her research in Hays. Dr. Bob Larson also discusses the Veterinary Training Program for Rural Kansas, their purpose and what they do.

3:31 Intake Regulation

11:36 Veterinary Training Program for Rural Kansas

16:18 Forage Utilization

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubci, Facebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Another Case of Open Heifers

Dr. Brad White and Dr. Bob Larson are back to discuss a case where a producer had 20% of heifers open. They explore potential causes behind this reproductive issue, from bull problems to nutritional and health-related factors. They also share practical strategies and management tips producers can implement to improve reproductive success and set the herd up for a better breeding season.

Theileriosis, Redwater, Freezer Beef

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode the crew is joined by parasite expert, Dr. Brian Herrin to discuss the theileriosis and tick control as well as Redwater disease. Finally the experts give some tips on marketing straight to consumer beef. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:54 Theileriosis and Tick Control

12:16 Listener Question: Redwater Disease

16:49 Listener Question: Freezer Beef

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubci, Facebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Pasture Pulse: Calf Scours

In this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Matt Miesner is back to discuss calf scours. Dr Miesner brings some tips on rehydrating calves, the options available, and how long you should give the calf electrolytes. They also discuss resources that are available to assist in making decisions.

Resources discussed:
Hartnack, A. K., Niehaus, A. J., Rousseau, M., Pentecost, R. L., Miesner, M. D., & Anderson, D. E. (2015). Indications for and factors relating to outcome after rumenotomy or rumenostomy in cattle: 95 cases (1999–2011). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association247(6), 659-664. Retrieved Jun 9, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.247.6.659

Braun U. Ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal tract in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009 Nov;25(3):567-90,  https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-26375

Cockwill, K. R., McAllister, T. A., & Olson, M. E. (2005). Comparison of four rumenotomy techniques in cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 46(12), 1111–1115. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1687032/

Research Update, Monitoring Cattle, Screwworm

Red cow in tall green grass with trees behind it.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! This episode starts off with a research update from BCI student Jordana Zimmermann. She talks about her project on rate of consumption. Next the experts discuss how to monitor herd health in a pasture. Finally the crew is joined by parasite expert, Dr. Brian Herrin to discuss the New World screwworm. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:28 Research Update: Consumption Rate

11:09 Pasture Herd Health

16:55 New World Screwworm

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubci, Facebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Selecting Cattle for Water Intake

Water use around feedlot cattle production is an important topic of discussion in sustainability circles. Most of the U.S. feedlot cattle production is in semi-arid climates where water resources are highly dependent on underground aquifers. The level of these aquifers has declined leading to discussion on the sustainability of feedlot cattle production in these regions.

Water intake of cattle accounts for about 3% of total water use for beef production – not just feedlot cattle. Thus, cattle drinking water is not the greatest use of water in these regions, but should be considered when assessing water use.

A few studies have been performed to evaluate the heritability of water intake in beef cattle. Heritability estimates are near 0.40 indicating that genetic improvement could be made through selection. Selecting for reduced water intake of feedlot cattle would result in less water use increasing sustainability. However, whether we should select for cattle with lesser water intake is debatable.

Water intake is related to feed intake where cattle that eat more typically drink more. Selection for reduced water intake could result in lower feed intake and thus lesser growth and performance. The genetic correlation between feed intake and water intake is relatively low near 0.35 indicating that selection for reduced water intake could be accomplished without affecting feed intake.

Cattle drink more water in hot weather as evaporation of water vapor from the lungs is the primary method used to cool themselves. Could selection for decreased water intake result in more heat stress and related deaths in feedlot cattle? Could selection for increased water intake result in fewer heat stress related deaths in feedlot cattle? There has been no data evaluating genetic or phenotypic differences in water intake in association with the animal’s ability to thermoregulate in heat stress environments.

In conclusion, water intake is a moderately heritable trait in cattle, but the use of this trait and the direction of genetic selection that could most benefit the industry is inconclusive.

After the Abstract: Detecting BRD

young cow

This week on After the Abstract, Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White break down a cutting-edge study that explores how technology can help detect bovine respiratory disease (BRD) earlier in pre-weaned dairy calves. The study tested automated monitoring systems that track calves’ feeding patterns, movement, and social interactions. The goal? To see if behavioral changes could serve as early warning signs for BRD—before clinical signs appear.
Article discussed: Early detection of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves using sensor-based feeding, movement, and social behaviour

Drones, Tariffs, Rotating Ionophores

Holstein cattle at a feed bunk.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Haley Larson , assistant professor of animal health at K-State Olathe. She shares her research on drones using thermal imaging to improve cattle management. Dustin Pendell continues the series on tariffs this week covering the impacts on the animal health corridor. Finally Larson discusses her research on rotating ionophores and their impact on cattle performance.

3:50 Drones for Thermal Imaging

12:03 Pasture Turnout

17:18 Rotating Ionophores

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Dead cattle have value too

No matter how well you take care of your cattle, some calves, yearling age animals, and even adults will die. Although a financial loss, these animals can be very valuable to your farm or ranch to help evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your health program and to provide information to your veterinarian to minimize future disease risk.

The term used to describe the thorough examination of a dead animal is necropsy. A veterinarian often uses a necropsy to determine the cause of death in the animal that died and more importantly, to determine if the rest of the herd is at-risk and if management changes need to be made to protect the herd.

It is important that the veterinarian start the necropsy with an open mind and to avoid having a preconceived diagnosis. There are also important tools that are needed for a proper necropsy including: sharp knives and other cutting instruments, bags to store samples, and appropriate cleansers and disinfectants to make sure that disease-causing germs cannot be spread to other animals.

A veterinarian starts the necropsy by getting a good history of the group or herd including the age, sex, and weight of the affected animals, how long the animal had been sick before death, and where the animal died and its position at death. In addition the veterinarian will determine what the herd or group has been eating and where it has been housed and if there is excessive mud, dust, or crowding. It is important to observe and possibly collect blood or other samples from healthy animals in the group, or from sick animals that show the same symptoms as the animals that died. Only after getting a good history and evaluating the environment will the veterinarian start to examine the dead animal by getting a general assessment of whether the animal appeared unthrifty prior to death and if there is evidence of swelling, fractures, wounds, or discharges from any body opening.

The veterinarian will then use a large knife to open the animal and begin a methodical examination of the body organs starting in the throat and chest by looking closely at the trachea and lungs and then the heart. Because pneumonia is a common threat to cattle, the location and type of any lung damage is noted. Joints such as the shoulder, hip, stifle, and hock are examined for evidence of abnormalities. The abdomen is then opened and the rumen and intestine and other organs are examined carefully. If the animal had symptoms indicating nervous system involvement, the brain and possibly spinal cord would be removed and examined.

Many times necropsies will include taking tissue and fluid samples and sending them to a diagnostic laboratory to be examined under a microscope or to be cultured to identify viruses or bacteria that may have contributed to the disease and death. Only samples taken from freshly dead animals and animals that died early in the disease process (preferably before being treated) are good candidates for sample submission for viral or bacterial culture. This is because in cases of pneumonia and other diseases, important viral populations can be cleared before death and bacterial populations can change so that later invaders can overgrowth the initial disease-causing bacteria, which can give misleading information about the type of virus or bacteria that were involved with the disease in its early stages.

Necropsies are not always successful at identifying the exact cause of death, but they are almost always helpful at identifying which possible diseases are not involved and for identifying which organs are healthy and which are diseased. Even if a diagnosis is not made, an important purpose of necropsies is to make sure that rare but dangerous diseases are not present on the farm or that common and easily diagnosed diseases are not a factor in the current problem.

To capture the most value for necropsies on your animals, you and your veterinarian should keep records so that trends or changes can be identified. The value of a single necropsy is not merely whether or not a diagnosis for that animal is made, but the value is based on the accumulation of evidence used to determine the level of health of the herd and if that level of health is changing. Necropsies are used extensively in evaluating the health status of all types of livestock herds and to aid in the diagnosis and control of disease. From a health standpoint, the most valuable animal on your farm or ranch may be the one that just died.

Finally, once the necropsy is completed, all the equipment used must be cleaned and disinfected and the coveralls, boots, and gloves worn by the veterinarian must be cleaned and disinfected or thrown away. In addition, the carcass of an animal that is necropsied must be disposed of properly. Each state has published rules about the disposal of dead livestock. Rendering, burial, composting, or burning are the most common means of disposal. If you are responsible for disposing of the body, be sure that you are in compliance with the law and that the dead animal is not a continued source of infection to other animals.

Diving into Diets: Sorghum Silage

In this episode of Bovine Science, we delve into the intricacies of sorghum silage processing and its impact on beef heifer nutrition. Our discussion centers around the recent study published in the Journal of Animal Science titled “Evaluation of kernel processing and processor type in whole-plant sorghum silage: effects on nutrient digestibility and animal performance in backgrounding beef heifers” (https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae369).

Tariffs, Clostridial Diseases, Beef Quality Assurance

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! For Dr. Brian Lubbers last episode as a host he shares information on clostridial diseases and the value of getting Beef Quality Assurance certified. Dr. Dustin Pendell also gives a breakdown on tariffs. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:23 Tariffs

11:19 Clostridial Diseases

16:30 Beef Quality Assurance
bqa.org

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Replacing distillers grains with corn: Does it impact cattle performance?

By Phillip Lancaster

In the last decade corn ethanol co-products have replaced a large portion of corn in diets of growing and finishing cattle due to availability and price. However, the price of corn has decreased considerably in the last year making it a cost-effective feedstuff in cattle diets again. A recent study evaluated replacing modified distillers grains with solubles with dry rolled corn in high roughage growing diets. Additionally, the study compared brome hay: sorghum silage with baled corn stalks as the forage source in the diet.

The study used 120 individually-fed steers weighing 620 lb at the start of the study. The steers were fed for 84 days and growth, feed intake and feed efficiency were measured. The diets consisted of 56% forage, 40% a combination of distillers grains and dry rolled corn, and 4% supplement. The main part of the study was to evaluate replacement of modified wet distillers grains with dry rolled corn. There were 4 diets with modified distllers grains at 40, 32, 24, and 16% of the diet dry matter. Dry rolled corn was then included at 0, 8, 16, and 24% of the diet dry matter. As distillers grains decreased in the diet and dry rolled corn increased, there was a linear decrease in gain and feed efficiency such that steers on all diets at the same amount of feed but gained differently (Figure 1).

A probable reason for the decreased gain of steers fed more dry rolled corn could be the decrease in protein in the diet. The protein was 17, 15, 13, and 12% for diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% distillers grains. In the diets with 24 and 16% distillers grains, urea was added to maintain protein levels at 12%. All diets were evaluated using a nutrition model and results indicated that all diets met requirements for metabolizable protein; however, true protein from distillers grains and microbial protein synthesis from urea may not have been equivalent.

The second part of the study was to evaluate brome hay: sorghum silage versus corn stalks as the forage source in the diet. The brome hay: sorghum silage had crude protein of 7.8%, neutral detergent fiber of 67% and digestibility of 54% compared to 4.0%, 77%, and 49% for the corn stalks indicating that the corn stalks were of lesser nutritional value. The corn stalks were included at 56% of the diet dry matter; the same as the brome hay: sorghum silage such that diets with corn stalks likely had lesser net energy for gain values. Steers fed corn stalks gain 1.76 lb/day compared to 2.89 lb/day for steers fed brome hay: sorghum silage. Interestingly, feed efficiency was the same between forage sources indicating that the lesser gain of steers fed corn stalks was due to lesser feed intake, and not necessarily lesser digestibility of the diet.

In conclusion, when dry rolled corn replaces large amounts of modified distillers grains in forage-based growing diets, a true protein source like soybean meal may need to be added to the diet. Replacing brome hay:sorghum silage with corn stalks may decrease feed intake and growth in backgrounding diets.

Figure 1. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) of steers fed diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% modified distillers grains (DGS) and 0, 8, 16, and 24% dry rolled corn (DRC). Adapted from Ferrari et al. (2024;  10.15232/aas.2024-02551). 

Pasture Pulse: Hardware Disease

Introducing the newest edition of Bovine Science, Pasture Pulse. For this edition Dr. Brad White is joined by Dr. Matt Miesner to discuss cattle health cases. On this episode a cow appears sick shortly after having the calf, but the cause is not easy to identify. Thanks for listening.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hardware Disease

Indications for and factors relating to outcome after rumenotomy or rumenostomy in cattle: 95 cases (1999–2011)

Grazing Strategies, Listener Question: Rash, Research Update

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses pros and cons of rotational grazing. The experts then take a listener question about a mysterious rash on their herd. Finally Dr. Conrad Schelkof gives a research update. Thanks for tuning in!

3:18 Continuous vs. Rotational Grazing

12:10 Listener Question: Rash or Herpes?

18:45 Conrad Schelkopf Research Update

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Poisoned Heifer

When this producer goes to move his heifers he finds one dead and others ill. With no obvious clues, what caused the heifer to die and could this happen to the others? Find out on this episode of Tox Talk a Bovine Science Podcast with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Sustainability, Health Metrics, Ranells Ranch

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Logan Thompson, KSU Sustainable Livestock Extension Specialist, to discus sustainability in the beef industry. The experts will also discuss what health metrics producers should be keeping track of for their herd. Dr. Thompson finishes the episode by talking about some of the current research he is working on.

3:56 State of Sustainability

11:19 Health Metrics

17:26 Ranells Ranch Research

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: Nasal Pathobiome Abundance

On this episode of After the Abstract Dr. Brian Lubbers brings in a hefty research paper which aims to compare nasal microbiome community diversity and composition. Drs. Lubbers and White discuss the implications of these findings, considering how nasal microbiome profiling could enhance BRD diagnostics and inform targeted interventions. Thanks for listening!

Article Discussed: Nasal pathobiont abundance is a moderate feedlot-dependent indicator of bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle

Drought, Pour-on, Innovation

Cattle at pasture

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the experts begin by discussing Dr. Lancaster’s new research on drought decisions. Next they answer a listener question about applying pour-on to cows. Finally they discuss new innovations and speculate about the future of the beef industry.

2:46 Drought Decisions

11:29 Listener Question: Pour-on

16:29 Innovations in the Beef Industry

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Pasture Management – Toxic Plant Considerations

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Cattlemen throughout history have known that some plants can be toxic to their animals. Some poisonous plants are only present in a few small areas of the U.S. while others are found over a wide geographic area. Some of these plants are poisonous during all phases of growth, while others are only poisonous (or more dangerous) during certain stages of growth or at certain times of the year.

Plants that cause damage to the heart or lungs will generally cause a very rapid death if a large enough dose is eaten – but if the amount consumed is less than a lethal dose, cattle may appear weak and depressed. Plants that are toxic to the liver or kidney seldom cause a rapid death, but instead a slow decline in health and body condition. Consuming plants that cause damage to the liver can result in the buildup of toxins that would normally be removed by a healthy liver. These toxins can cause the skin to become very sensitive to sunburn and can cause other signs of liver failure such as weight loss and poor performance. Some plants are toxic to the kidney – particularly plants such as oak trees that accumulate tannins. Cattle with kidney damage may show signs of reduced appetite, rapid weight loss, and increased water intake.

Some plants are toxic to the nervous system such as some types of ryegrass, locoweeds, and water hemlock. Cattle that eat these plants may suffer from rapid death or longer-term weight loss and nervous system signs depending on the specific plant and the amount consumed. Signs of nervous system problems include staggering, apparent blindness, exaggerated movements, and hyper-excitability.

Abortion or the development of birth defects can occur when pregnant cattle consume certain toxic plants. Abortions caused by toxic plants are often difficult to diagnose, and the birth defects caused by some toxic plants are the same or similar to defects caused by genetic problems or viral infection. Loco weeds, tobacco, lupine, and poison hemlock are known to cause birth defects in calves in certain situations when pregnant cows consume these plants.

In order to diagnose suspected plant poisonings you should work with your veterinarian and a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. Your veterinarian can help you to develop an accurate history and time-line for the problem. To identify the cause of losses due to poisonous plants, the pasture or pen should be inspected, both alive and dead animals should be examined, and diagnostic samples of plants, blood, and tissues should be properly collected and then evaluated by trained diagnostic laboratory personnel. The presence of toxic plants in pastures or hays is not proof that cattle have been harmed by the plants because many time cattle will refuse to eat them. However, finding evidence of consumption of potentially toxic plants by animals, either by observing evidence of grazing of suspected plants or by finding parts of these plants in the digestive tract of a dead animal is highly suggestive of poisonings.

Because removing all toxic plants from a range or pasture is not likely to be practical or successful, good grazing management using stocking density, fencing, water development and salt/supplement placement to maintain good pasture health will

minimize the incentive for cattle to graze toxic plants. If it appears that a toxic plant problem is occurring, cattle should be removed from the suspected pasture immediately and a veterinarian should be contacted. It is important to work with veterinarians, Extension agents, natural resource conservation service specialists, and range specialists who can all help develop a plan to keep pastures healthy and minimize the risk of toxic plant poisonings.

Diving into Diets: Feed Digestibility

In this episode our hosts discuss the affects of pregnancy on digestion in beef cattle. They look at passage rate and extent of digestibility. Dr. Lancaster brings and article out of Brazil that studies these aspects.

Article discussed: Pregnancy affects maternal performance, feed intake, and digestion kinetics parameters in beef heifers

Research Update, Scorecards, Marketing

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Jason Warner, KSU Extension Cow-Calf Specialist and PhD student Maddie Mancke to discuss Maddie’s research on heat stress. Dr. Warner also gives some advice on filling out calving scorecards to evaluate the calving season. Finally Dr. Dustin Pendell gives some tips on marketing your cow-calf herd.

3:11 Research Update: Heat Stress

11:28 Calving Scorecard

17:35 Marketing Tips  

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Purebred Cows are Open

On this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Bob Larson brings a case study where a producer had only their purebred cattle open and not crossbred. Dr. Larson and Dr. Brad White will go through how they got to the bottom of this case. They will also look at what the producer can do to keep from having this problem again.