After the Abstract: Hemotropic Mycoplasma

Dr. Brian Lubbers is back with another research article from the Journal of Dairy Science. This research looks at prevalence of hemotropic mycoplasma in heifers on Michigan farms. Dr. Lubbers and Dr. White break down this paper and discuss how it may be applied to beef cattle in Kansas.

Article Discussed: https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)00504-6/fulltext

IBR, Grazing Crop Stubble, Dose Accuracy

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode we have guest host Dr. Scott Fritz. Our experts begin the episode by discussing IBR and its effects on a cattle herd. Next Dr. Fritz gives some tips on things to look out for when grazing crop stubbles in order to avoid sickness. Finally, Dr. Brad White asks hosts about dose accuracy when giving vaccines. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:10 Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR)

11:26 Grazing Crop Stubble

16:32 Dose Accuracy

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Audio Player

Herd Health: Ultrasound Technology

In this episode of Herd Health Dr. Bob Larson brings an article studying Doppler ultrasounds on cattle. Dr. Brad White and Dr. Larson discuss what this technology could mean for the future of analyzing cows. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

Article Discussed: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/animalscience/articles/10.3389/fanim.2022.912854/full

BVD, Heifer Synchronization, Feeding Corn

Happy New Year! On this episode our experts begin by answering a listener question about BVD in their herd . Next ESTROTECT brings back Dr. Ken Odde to discuss estrus synchronization in his herd. Finally Dr. Lancaster does some calculating to decide what type of corn should be fed in a listener question. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:41 Listener Question: BVD Diagnosis

11:35 Dr. Ken Odde on Heifer Synchronization sponsored by ESTROTECT

19:32 Listener Question: Finishing Cattle on Corn

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Reducing Methane

In this episode Dr. Phillip Lancaster and Dr. Brad White are talking about methane emissions. Dr. Lancaster also brings an article out of Australia which looks at adjusting grazing systems to reduce the methane in the cow-calf sector. Thank you for listening and enjoy the show!

Dr. Marshall Stewart, Senior Cows, Starting a Ranch

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode we have a very special guest, Dr. Marshall Stewart, the Executive Vice President for External Engagement and Chief of Staff here at K-State. Dr. Larson begins our episode by asking the experts about the importance of outreach and extension. Next they answer a listener question concerning senior cows. Finally, Dr. Stewart and the experts give some advice on those wanting to get into ranching and where to begin. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:12 Outreach with Marshall Stewart

10:06 Listener Question: Senior Cows

14:24 Starting a Ranch

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Death in a Dry Lot

In order to gain some weight 16 cows are put in a dry lot on feed, one morning the producer sees they haven’t eaten and the next morning 8 of them are dead. Dr. Scott Fritz and Dr. Brad White get to the bottom of this case in this edition of Tox Talk: a Bovine Science with BCI podcast. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

New World Screwworm

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

An old pest recently made news in November when the U.S. suspended Mexican cattle imports because a case of New World screwworm was identified in the southern part of Mexico. This pest used to be common in the southern U.S. but starting in the 1950s, the USDA, with the support of various cattlemen’s associations, worked to eradicate the fly from the U.S.; and then with partnerships with other countries, to push south through Mexico, Central America, and finally to Panama. The screwworm fly is still widespread in tropical areas of the Caribbean and South America.

A fly goes through four life stages: an adult fly lays hundreds of eggs, the eggs hatch into larvae (commonly called maggots), then they enter the pupa stage (cocoon-like form) where they grow into adult flies. For most flies, the adults lay eggs in fresh manure, decaying manure, decaying plant material, or occasionally decaying animal flesh (such as a wound with dead tissue). The screwworm is different in that the fly will lay eggs in any opening in otherwise healthy skin (such as the navel of newborn calves or a scratch or fresh wound), and the larvae (or maggots) will feed on the healthy tissue – causing severe damage or even death.

Before the fly was eradicated from the U.S., it caused millions of dollars of losses – and the damage extended beyond cattle and other livestock to any warm-blooded animal including wildlife, pets, and even people. The eradication of this parasite is an impressive success story that required years of effort and investment by the USDA and other federal agencies as well as cooperation with Mexico and other Central American and Caribbean countries. But, in order for the work and investment involved in the eradication effort to pay-off, a unique weakness in the screwworm fly lifecycle had to be exploited. Unlike other flies, a screwworm female only mates once. If she mates with a sterile male, she will never produce live offspring. Scientists at USDA used this information to begin looking for a method to sterilize male screwworms and found that a specific dose of radiation at a specific time in the pupa stage would sterilize the males while still allowing them to be able to mate.

By raising and sterilizing many millions of screwworm flies and then releasing them across the southern U.S. starting in the late 1950s, the screwworm was eradicated by 1966. However, keeping the screwworm fly out of the U.S. is a constant battle and several isolated outbreaks have occurred – most recently in 2016 in the Florida Keys. In order to reduce the likelihood of re-exposure, the U.S. has worked with Mexico and into Central America to use sterile flies to eradicate Screwworm flies all the way to a biologic barrier established in Panama.

Although the strategy to keep screwworms south of Panama has been mostly successful, the effort requires: continual release of sterile flies, restriction of animal movement, and rigorous monitoring for signs of screwworm infestation. The only current screwworm sterilization facility is in Panama and it produces about 20 million pupae per week. Because of the recent discovery of screwworms as far north as southern Mexico, the USDA and other agencies are working with Mexico and other countries in the area to re-establish an effective barrier in Panama.

Cover Crops, Changing Needles, Forward Planning

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts along with guest host Dr. Todd Gunderson answer a listener question about fall calving on a cover crop. Next they answer a listener question about changing needles and how often it should be done. Finally Dr. Pendell discusses planning ahead for the next year. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:31 Listener Question: Fall Calving on Cover Crops

11:05 Listener Question: Changing Needles

16:19 Forward Planning

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Bull Fertility

This episode of Herd Health a Bovine Science podcast with BCI our hosts discuss research on bull fertility. Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White dive into a paper from Assumpção and Hamilton. This research evaluates bull sperm to analyze what amount of bulls pass the BSE but end up being infertile.

Article Discused: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107656

New World Screwworm, Water Belly, Cold Weather

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts along with guest host Dr. Todd Gunderson discuss the New World Screwworm or Cochliomyia hominivorax. Next they answer a listener question about water belly or urolithiasis. Finally Dr. Dustin Pendell is back with some tips on book keeping in cold weather. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:00 New World Screwworm

8:58 Listener Question: Water belly

14:22 Cold Weather Tips

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Do Producer and Consumer Perceptions of Beef Sustainability Align?

Sustainability has been a large buzz word over the last 2 decades, and beef sustainability has gotten a lot of attention based on the amount of enteric methane produced from rumen fermentation of feeds. In more recent years, grazing management and soil carbon has received a lot of attention in the beef industry focusing on the potential of grazing methods to increase carbon sequestration in the soil.

Producers get some information from different media outlets, but most likely focus on information coming from industry sources tied to research on beef production and sustainability. Consumers get information on beef sustainability from a wide range of media outlets and do not have a consistent ‘industry’ source. Additionally, the lack of direct ties to beef production by consumers may allow misinformation to influence their understanding of beef production.

Recent surveys have investigated the ideas and perceptions of producers and consumers about beef sustainability. Producers generally associate sustainable beef production with conserving land and water resources (47%) and economic viability of the ranch (43%) more than animal welfare (18%) and greenhouse gas emissions (2%). However, consumers generally associate sustainable beef production with animal welfare (55%) most and think about conserving land and water resources (32%), economic viability of the ranch (25%) and greenhouse gas emissions (24%) less.

Overall, there appears to be a large disconnect between the importance of animal welfare to sustainability between consumers and producers, which may be due to the lack of direct knowledge of beef production practices by consumers. Consumers also rank no antibiotics and hormones very high on the list of important attributes of sustainably raised beef (57% of consumers). A much smaller percentage of producers (18%) that associated beef sustainability with animal welfare mentioned raising cattle with hormones and antibiotics.

Additionally, there is a large disconnect between producers and consumers on the importance of greenhouse gas emission in sustainable beef production. Only 2% of producers mentioned climate, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon emissions, etc. when asked about components of sustainable beef production. However, 24% of consumers indicated greenhouse gas emissions were important. Although, greenhouse gas emissions seem to be the least important factor for most consumers. In a recent willingness to pay study at Kansas State University, consumers indicated that they were willing to pay $0.81 more per pound of ‘low carbon’ beef, whereas they were willing to pay $5.04 more per pound of ‘antibiotic free’ beef.

There is a disconnect between producers and consumers around perceptions of the components of sustainable beef production. Consumer education could be a means to reducing the disconnect between producers and consumers, but also producers need to understand that consumers generally think differently about sustainable beef production, which may help to ultimately producer beef in higher demand by consumers.

Figure 1. Percentage of producers or consumers who associate sustainable beef production with various topics. Adapted from Smith et al. (2024; https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00253-y) and Midan Marketing (https://midanmarketing.com/reports/sustainably-raised-meat/).

After the Abstract: Neurologic Case Report

In this episode of After the Abstract Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White go over a case report to see how practitioners are diagnosing neurologic disease. The experts will examine the article to see what they found and what this could mean for bovine practitioners. Thanks for listening and enjoy the episode!

Link to Article: https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol57no1p1-9

Judging Teams, Finishing Cattle, Quick Fire Questions

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts congratulate former student Jacob Klaudt on winning the national Livestock Judging Competition as well as congratulate the K-State meats judging team on a national championship. Next Dr. Lancaster answers a listener question pertaining to finishing steers at home and how to feed them. Finally we bring back guest host Dr. Todd Gunderson to answer some rapid fire questions from Dr. Brad White. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:30 Youth Judging Teams

6:15 Listener Question: Finishing Cattle

11:26 Quick Questions with Dr. Todd Gunderson

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Beef Quality Assurance

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Every businessperson must keep his/her customers in mind in all management decisions. The cow/calf producer has two customers to please: 1) the owner of the calves once they leave the ranch and 2) the beef-eating consumer.

Once calves leave the ranch, ideally they should adapt quickly to the new environment and ration so that health problems are kept to a minimum and growth and efficiency are enhanced. Supplying calves that have been properly immunized and adapted to concentrate rations will fulfill the needs of the feeder. Lingering health problems, over-conditioning, drug or physical adulteration that will carry through to the beef-eating consumer, or injection blemishes that carry through the feeding period are concerns of your feedlot customers.

The beef-eating consumer wants a product that is safe, free from drug residues, free of injection blemishes or abscesses, and flavorful. It is every producer’s job to ensure that every steak, hamburger and roast that comes out of his farm or lot can meet the customers’ demands. Avoiding violative drug residues starts with a plan and record keeping system that emphasizes the proper treatment of disease and identification of treated animals. Proper treatment for any disease begins with using the correct drug at the correct dosage for the proper length of time. In order to ensure that you are meeting these requirements, a close working relationship with a veterinarian is essential. A commitment to keeping animals with drug residues off the consumer’s plate means identifying and delaying marketing of animals treated with a drug until such a time as they have been untreated for the minimum number of days stated on the label if the drug was used exactly as specified on the label; or for an extended period of time, as determined by your veterinarian, if the product was used in any extra-label fashion.

In addition to being assured that the beef they purchase is free of residues, consumers have every right to expect their meat to be free of injection blemishes. By following simple standards of sanitation and animal handling, the incidence of injection site blemishes should be extremely small. Animals should be properly restrained and the syringes and other dosing equipment should be clean and functioning properly. Needles should be changed every 10 head or more frequently, and no more than 10 cc should be administered in any one sight. Any product that is labeled for subcutaneous administration should be given by that route, and any products labeled for intramuscular administration only should be given into non-prime cuts, such as the neck muscles.

Cattlemen, their employees, veterinarian, nutritionist, and any others involved with the ranch must each examine what could go wrong from their prospective in the delivery of a safe, wholesome and desirable product to the consumer. Once potential problems are identified, strategies or production practices are put into place to avoid those problems from ever occurring. Methods of record-keeping, employee training, and daily practices are instituted to check and verify (and document) that you are accomplishing what you intended to do. A well-planned BQA program is designed so that everyday management activities act to eliminate potential problems.

A good place to start when planning your herds program is with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association’s BQA guidelines. http://www.bqa.org/

Diving into Diets: Vitamin A

In this episode of Diving into Diets a Bovine Science Podcast Dr. White and Dr. Lancaster look at a research paper about the guidelines for supplementing vitamin A. This research answers some questions about vitamin A in cattle but also raises some new ones for our hosts. Thanks for listening!

Link to Article: https://www.appliedanimalscience.org/article/S2590-2865(24)00094-6/fulltext

Pineapples and Cows, Protein Supplements, Ranch Horses

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts answer a listener question from South Africa that talks about increasing herd size, managing disease, and affordable feed plans. Next Dr. Lancaster answers a question about NPNs. Finally our guest Dr. Laurie Beard talks about tips and techniques for managing your ranch horse. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:19 South Africa Listener Questions

10:26 Pros and Cons of Non-Protein Nitrogen

15:15 Managing Ranch Horses

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Tox Talk: Box of Tissue

In the initial call Dr. Scott Fritz receives a box of cattle to determine what caused 30% death loss after heifers were put out on grass. Find out how they got to the bottom of this case on this episode of Tox Talk with Dr. Brad White and Dr. Scott Fritz. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the show!

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Biosecurity vs Biocontainment, Feeding Cows, FDA on Aspirin

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! This week our experts are joined by Dr. Todd Gunderson. They begin by discussing the difference between biosecurity and biocontainment, as well as their importance. Next Dr. Gunderson gives some advice on feeding second and third trimester cows. Dr. Brian Lubbers concludes the episode with an update from the FDA on using aspirin.

4:25 Biosecurity and Biocontainment

10:40 Feeding Second and Third Trimester Cows

15:40 FDA Update

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on Instagram and X at @ksubci or Facebook. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

After the Abstract: A.I.

In this episode of After the Abstract Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Brad White look at a research paper from the Journal of Dairy Science. This research uses machine learning models to identify intramammary infections, and compares it to a rule based algorithm. The experts discuss how this could be used for the beef industry and what it could mean for the future of technology in cattle. Thanks for listening!

Link to paper: https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)01180-9/fulltext

Incoming Cattle, Bull Health Problem, Ionophores

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! This episode is full of listener questions, up first the experts talk about live or modified vaccines on incoming cattle. The episode continues with a bull health situation from a listener. Finally the experts give their thoughts on using ionophores in the winter. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:40 Vaccinating Incoming Cattle

11:30 Bull Health Problem

16:38 Ionophores

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Potential feed additive to reduce effects of fescue toxicosis

Fescue toxicosis is a syndrome of cattle consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue. The endophyte provides a hardiness to the plant allowing the plant to grow in stressful conditions such as drought and cold temperatures. However, the endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that are detrimental to cattle performance. Cattle experience hormonal changes in the production of and response to natural serotonin that result in lower heat tolerance and reduced feed intake.

Serotonin is synthesized in the body from the amino acid tryptophan. One therapy being explored is administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan, which is a step in the synthesis of serotonin from tryptophan. In a recent study, researchers at USDA-ARS tested the effect of 5-hydroxytryptophan on the response of steers fed endophyte-infected fescue seed. By providing 5-hydroxytryptophan, the researchers were able to reverse the negative effects of ergot alkaloids on blood serotonin levels and cattle feed intake (Figure 1). The control steers that were not fed endophyte-infected seed or 5-hydroxytryptophan consumed 1.9% of body weight whereas the steers fed endophyte-infected seed without 5-hydroxytryptophan consumed only 1.8% of body weight. However, when steers fed endophyte-infected seed were also given 5-hydroxytryptophan, feed intake was not different from the control steers indicating that 5-hydrxytyptophan reversed the negative effects of endophyte-infected seed on feed intake.

Giving cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue a dose of 5-hydroxytryptophan would likely greatly improve the performance of these cattle. However, 5-hydroxytryptophan is not ready for commercial application yet. In this study, steers were dosed with 5-hydroxytryptophan through a rumen cannula into the abomasum, thus bypassing the rumen microbes and any possible degradation of 5-hydroxytryptophan. Before 5-hydroxytryptophan could be added to feed, a method to protect it from the rumen microbes will need to be developed. However, this molecule shows great potential to improve performance of cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue.

Diving into Diets: Late Gestational Nutrition

In this episode of Diving into Diets a Bovine Science Podcast Dr. White and Dr. Lancaster look at a research paper about the effects of poor nutrition on late gestation cows. They will dive into what this means for future research as well as their key takeaways.

Article Discussed: Colby A Redifer, Lindsey G Wichman, Shelby L Davies-Jenkins, Abigail R Rathert-Williams, Harvey C Freetly, Allison M Meyer, Late gestational nutrient restriction in primiparous beef females: Performance and metabolic status of lactating dams and pre-weaning calves, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 102, 2024, skae015, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae015

Producer Records, CalfDex, Beef Dairy Cross

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! Dr. Brad White, Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Bob Larson are joined this week by Cambree Schmaltz and Dr. Ted Schroeder. They discuss some exciting new innovations in record keeping for cow calf producers and Cambree talks about her research project looking into the economics of beef-dairy cross and serial slaughter.

3:00 Replacement Heifers

9:32 CalfDex: https://calfdexapi.azurewebsites.net/

15:36 Beef-Dairy Cross Cattle on Feed

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @The_BCIFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Blackleg and other clostridial diseases of young calves

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Blackleg and other clostridial diseases are caused by a family of bacteria that can release large amounts of toxins that vary between the specific clostridial organisms. Different species of clostridial bacteria tend to cause disease in different ages of cattle, and the most common clostridial diseases of young calves are blackleg, clostridial enterotoxemia, and occasionally, tetanus.

Blackleg is caused by Clostridia chauvoei that enters cattle through the digestive tract and can be found in many tissues of healthy animals. The disease is created when the bacteria multiply rapidly in muscle and releases large quantities of a fatal toxin. Muscle trauma or bruising from handling, trucking, or normal animal interactions may be required for the bacteria to have a suitable environment to multiply rapidly, but the exact requirements for disease onset is not known.

Blackleg is most common in young calves up to 12 months of age, with animals more than 1 to 2 years of age rarely being affected. The disease attacks very rapidly and in many cases a dead calf is the first indication of a problem. Blackleg (like other clostridial diseases) is not considered a contagious disease, in that the disease does not pass directly from one calf to another – rather it is from soil to an animal. An outbreak may appear contagious in that a number of animals can be affected in a short period of time, usually following a soil disturbance. Any event that disturbs the soil, such as flooding, pond repair, bulldozer work, laying water pipe, etc, can initiate an outbreak of blackleg disease in pastures with heavy loads of blackleg organisms. Although vaccination is not 100% successful at protecting calves from blackleg disease (especially in young calves), vaccination will decrease the number of calves that are susceptible to the organism.

Clostridium perfringens or enterotoxemia is typically a disease of young calves. Most commonly, death following the onset of disease is so rapid that the first sign of a problem is to find a dead calf. Affected calves are typically suckling cows with high milk production and are often the healthiest, fastest-growing calves. Because the germ normally lives in the gut of healthy calves, two things must happen for the organism to multiply rapidly and produce large amounts of the toxin. First, the bacteria need an abundance of carbohydrates (which is present in milk), and secondly, the intestinal tract motility must be at least partially slowed (which occurs following a large meal). Following a large milk meal, high levels of toxin can be produced and death can occur rapidly.

Tetanus is caused by Clostridium tetani and cattle are not as susceptible as many other species – but deaths due to tetanus are occasionally seen. The organism can enter a wound and produce toxins that cause death. Many commercially available clostridial “Blackleg” vaccines do not include a component for protection against tetanus. Vaccines for cattle that provide protection against tetanus are available, and are commonly used when cattle are castrated with elastic bands as this method of castration is associated with some tetanus deaths.

Because the vaccine is fairly effective, a program where calves are initially vaccinated at 2 to 3 months of age with subsequent revaccination is recommended.