Diving into Diets: Grazing Behavior

On this week’s episode of Diving into Diets Dr. Brad White and Dr. Philip Lancaster discuss a 2025 study on grazing behavior in cattle, focusing on factors like age, size, hide color, and forage quality. The study tracked 40 cows using GPS collars over three years, finding that older cows traveled further distances, possibly due to learning topography. Red cows traveled more in cold temperatures due to better heat retention from black hides. The study also noted that cows traveled further to high-quality forage areas, as measured by NDVI and IRG, and up slopes and to water sources. The study’s individual hypothesis testing approach limited the interpretation of confounding variables like production stage and weather.

Article Discussed: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871141325001258?via%3Dihub 

Guest: Dr. Cassandra Olds, Theileria, Theileria Transmission, Winter Feeding Strategies

This episode of Cattle Chat features guest Dr. Cassandra Olds, an entomologist, who shares with the group about her research on Theileria, an emerging protozoan parasite in cattle. Dr. Olds explains that Theileria is tick‑borne but can also be spread by sucking lice, possibly stable flies, limited placental transmission, and contaminated needles or equipment, emphasizing single‑needle use and the difficulty of vector control. The conversation then shifts to winter hay feeding strategy: estimating cow weights and forage intake, testing hay quality, minimizing waste, cleaning up old hay to reduce stable fly breeding sites, and tracking bale disappearance over time to adjust feeding and prevent cows from losing condition.

4:11 Theileria

5:25 Theileria Transmission

17:01 Winter Feeding Strategies

Hay Inventory Calculator | AgManager.info

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubci, Facebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget, if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Essential Oils in Feed Rations Part 3

In this episode of Diving into Diets, Dr. Brad White and Dr. Phillip Lancaster finish up the essential oils in feed rations series with another article. The experts discuss how essential oils compare to commonly used feed additives like Monensin.

Article Discussed: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109002332100054X

Diving into Diets: Essential Oils in Rations, Part 2

In this episode of Bovine Science, Dr. Phillip Lancaster continues the series with an article that looks into the use of essential oils in feed rations. In part two of the Essential Oils in Rations series, they talk about the different benefits and effects of adding the oils to your feed.

Article Discussed: https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/8/6/254

Diving into Diets: Essential Oils in Feed Rations

In this episode of Bovine Science, Dr. Phillip Lancaster brings an article that looked into the use of essential oils in feed rations. The experts go over this paper and the styles of research groups used for the experiment.

Article Discussed: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377840124000841

Diving into Diets: Essential Oils in Feed Rations

In this episode of Bovine Science, Dr. Phillip Lancaster brings an article that looked into the use of essential oils in feed rations. The experts go over this paper and the styles of research groups used for the experiment.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377840124000841

Gain and health of receiving cattle given organic trace minerals

By Phillip Lancaster

Compared with carbohydrate and protein metabolism, mineral metabolism in cattle is much less understood. The lack of knowledge about the mineral metabolism has led to an idea among cattlemen that there is something special about certain minerals. Based on what we do know about mineral absorption, the key is to use mineral forms with high absorption. Generally, chloride and sulfate forms (e.g. copper chloride or copper sulfate) have greater absorption than oxide forms (e.g. copper oxide), although this is not always the case (e.g. magnesium oxide ~ magnesium chloride).

Another major issue with mineral absorption is antagonists. Antagonists bind the mineral in the rumen making it unavailable for absorption in the intestine. A common example of antagonism is high levels of sulfur and molybdenum bind with copper creating thiomolybdates rendering copper unavailable for absorption.

Mineral content of feeds can be highly variable affected by the plant species, mineral content of the soil, and mineral availability in the soil where the plants were grown. In many cases, cattlemen have little information on the mineral content of the forage and feed because testing is expensive and rarely performed.

In this uncertainty, the development of organic trace minerals have gained interest as they generally have greater absorption than their inorganic counterparts. In forages and feeds, the minerals are generally in an organic form and thus organic minerals are more similar to the natural minerals in feeds consumed by cattle. However, in feeds, the mineral element is released from its organic form during digestion allowing for absorption.

Organic forms of minerals have generally been reported to be beneficial during times of stress, but results have been inconsistent. A recent meta-analysis of the published studies summarized the results comparing organic and inorganic trace mineral supplementation to feedlot receiving cattle. Overall, organic trace mineral supplementation improved average daily gain 0.13 lb/day but there were some caveats (Figure 1). Average daily gain was improved by organic trace mineral supplementation in cattle classified as low risk (increase in ADG = 0.15 lb/day) for bovine respiratory disease, but not in cattle classified as high risk. In studies with a receiving period longer than 30 days, ADG was increased 0.13 lb/day by organic trace mineral supplementation, but not in studies with a receiving period less than 30 days. Average daily gain was increased 0.13 lb/day when antibiotics (monensin and tylosin) were not used in the feed, but was ADG was not increased when antibiotics were used in the feed.

In regard to bovine respiratory disease morbidity, organic trace mineral supplementation had no effect overall. The effect of organic trace mineral supplementation on morbidity was not affected by BRD risk classification, length of the receiving period, or use of in-feed antibiotics.

In conclusion, supplementation of organic trace minerals can be beneficial in some situations, particularly when antagonisms are impacting absorption of inorganic trace minerals. However, using organic trace minerals in place of inorganic trace minerals will not always result in improved animal performance and health outcomes.

Bar graph showing the increase in average daily gain (lb/day) in cattle under different conditions: overall, low risk, high risk, receiving periods less than and greater than 30 days, and with or without antibiotics.

Reinvesting, Calves on Feed, Risk Management

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the full crew is in the studio to discuss reinvesting in your operation. They also talk about feeding calves and manure scoring. Finally they go over risk management strategies of all kinds. Thanks for listening and enjoy the episode!

5:10 Reinvesting in the Herd

10:57 Calves on Feed

16:00 Risk Management

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Forage sources and weaning methods for preconditioning calves

By Phillip Lancaster

Weaning and preconditioning calves is a stressful time for the calves, but a time when a lot of value can be gained with the right management. Preconditioning can allow calves to get over the stress of weaning, become bunk broke, and gain some weight all of which adds value to the calves at the time of sale. Calves that are weaned often spend a considerable amount of time walking the fenceline bawling, and more importantly not eating. During this time calves can lose weight, which means that for preconditioning to be cost effective, the calves must regain the lost weight and gain additional weight.

A recent study evaluated 3 different weaning methods and 3 different forage sources on preconditioning weight gain. Calves were weaned abruptly, fence-line weaned, or nose-flap weaned. Within each weaning method, calves were fed cool-season grass-clover baleage, bermudagrass hay, or grazed a pasture with a mixture of crabgrass, pearl millet and forage soybean for 60 days. The crude protein of the baleage, hay, and pasture were 14.9, 12.8, and 10.6%, and the estimated total digestible nutrients of all forage sources was approximately 55%. All calves were fed dried distillers grains at 1% of body weight.

There was no interaction between weaning method and preconditioning diet. Calves weaned using the fence-line method gained 1.85 lb/day compared with 1.76 lb/day for the nose-flap and abrupt weaning methods during the first 30 days. There was no difference in weight gain among weaning methods for the second 30 days or overall.

Calves fed hay gained faster in the first 30 days of the preconditioning period, but much slower in the second 30 days than calves fed baleage or pasture (Figure 1). There was no difference in gain between baleage and pasture groups in the first or second 30 days. Over the entire 60 days, calves fed hay gained less than calves fed baleage or pasture.

Weaning method and forage source can affect weight gain in the first 30 days, but more important economically is the weight gain of the overall preconditioning period. In this case, weaning treatment did not affect overall weight gain, but forage source did.

Bar graph showing average daily weight gain (in lbs/day) of calves during preconditioning, comparing three forage sources: pasture, hay, and baleage over two 30-day periods and overall.

VRSP Students, Listeriosis, Co-grazing

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses the Veterinary Research Scholars Program and the research those students have done with the BCI. Next, the crew explain listeriosis and how to identify it in your herd. Finally they have a debate over co-grazing, it’s benefits and potential risks.

2:49 Veterinary Research Summer Scholar Program

10:20 Listeriosis

15:08 Co-grazing

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Corn Diet, Breeding Heifers, Calf Digestion

Black cow in green pasture.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team discusses feeding growing heifers alfalfa and corn. Next Dr. Phillip Lancaster and Dr. Bob Larson debate how early you should breed heifers versus the cows.Finally, Dr. Billy Brown returns to share insights on rumen development in calves and what it means for their future performance.

2:52 Listener Question: Feeding Heifers

11:37 Breeding Heifers Versus Breeding Cows

16:07 Calf Digestion with Billy Brown

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Calving Season, Clostridium Perfringens, Starting Calves

Black calf with white face standing in open green grass.

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by Dr. Billy Brown, assistant professor in dairy cattle nutrition. They start the episode with a debate on when the best time is to calve out cows. Next, the crew answers a question from a listener who had a calf diagnosed with overeating disease. Finally Billy talks about some of his research on supplements and calves.

2:33 Calving Season Debate

12:13 Listener Questions: Overeating

17:21 Starting Calves with Distillers Grains

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Sorghum Silage

In this episode of Bovine Science, we delve into the intricacies of sorghum silage processing and its impact on beef heifer nutrition. Our discussion centers around the recent study published in the Journal of Animal Science titled “Evaluation of kernel processing and processor type in whole-plant sorghum silage: effects on nutrient digestibility and animal performance in backgrounding beef heifers” (https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae369).

Tariffs, Clostridial Diseases, Beef Quality Assurance

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! For Dr. Brian Lubbers last episode as a host he shares information on clostridial diseases and the value of getting Beef Quality Assurance certified. Dr. Dustin Pendell also gives a breakdown on tariffs. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:23 Tariffs

11:19 Clostridial Diseases

16:30 Beef Quality Assurance
bqa.org

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Replacing distillers grains with corn: Does it impact cattle performance?

By Phillip Lancaster

In the last decade corn ethanol co-products have replaced a large portion of corn in diets of growing and finishing cattle due to availability and price. However, the price of corn has decreased considerably in the last year making it a cost-effective feedstuff in cattle diets again. A recent study evaluated replacing modified distillers grains with solubles with dry rolled corn in high roughage growing diets. Additionally, the study compared brome hay: sorghum silage with baled corn stalks as the forage source in the diet.

The study used 120 individually-fed steers weighing 620 lb at the start of the study. The steers were fed for 84 days and growth, feed intake and feed efficiency were measured. The diets consisted of 56% forage, 40% a combination of distillers grains and dry rolled corn, and 4% supplement. The main part of the study was to evaluate replacement of modified wet distillers grains with dry rolled corn. There were 4 diets with modified distllers grains at 40, 32, 24, and 16% of the diet dry matter. Dry rolled corn was then included at 0, 8, 16, and 24% of the diet dry matter. As distillers grains decreased in the diet and dry rolled corn increased, there was a linear decrease in gain and feed efficiency such that steers on all diets at the same amount of feed but gained differently (Figure 1).

A probable reason for the decreased gain of steers fed more dry rolled corn could be the decrease in protein in the diet. The protein was 17, 15, 13, and 12% for diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% distillers grains. In the diets with 24 and 16% distillers grains, urea was added to maintain protein levels at 12%. All diets were evaluated using a nutrition model and results indicated that all diets met requirements for metabolizable protein; however, true protein from distillers grains and microbial protein synthesis from urea may not have been equivalent.

The second part of the study was to evaluate brome hay: sorghum silage versus corn stalks as the forage source in the diet. The brome hay: sorghum silage had crude protein of 7.8%, neutral detergent fiber of 67% and digestibility of 54% compared to 4.0%, 77%, and 49% for the corn stalks indicating that the corn stalks were of lesser nutritional value. The corn stalks were included at 56% of the diet dry matter; the same as the brome hay: sorghum silage such that diets with corn stalks likely had lesser net energy for gain values. Steers fed corn stalks gain 1.76 lb/day compared to 2.89 lb/day for steers fed brome hay: sorghum silage. Interestingly, feed efficiency was the same between forage sources indicating that the lesser gain of steers fed corn stalks was due to lesser feed intake, and not necessarily lesser digestibility of the diet.

In conclusion, when dry rolled corn replaces large amounts of modified distillers grains in forage-based growing diets, a true protein source like soybean meal may need to be added to the diet. Replacing brome hay:sorghum silage with corn stalks may decrease feed intake and growth in backgrounding diets.

Figure 1. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) of steers fed diets with 40, 32, 24, and 16% modified distillers grains (DGS) and 0, 8, 16, and 24% dry rolled corn (DRC). Adapted from Ferrari et al. (2024;  10.15232/aas.2024-02551). 

Pasture Management – Toxic Plant Considerations

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Cattlemen throughout history have known that some plants can be toxic to their animals. Some poisonous plants are only present in a few small areas of the U.S. while others are found over a wide geographic area. Some of these plants are poisonous during all phases of growth, while others are only poisonous (or more dangerous) during certain stages of growth or at certain times of the year.

Plants that cause damage to the heart or lungs will generally cause a very rapid death if a large enough dose is eaten – but if the amount consumed is less than a lethal dose, cattle may appear weak and depressed. Plants that are toxic to the liver or kidney seldom cause a rapid death, but instead a slow decline in health and body condition. Consuming plants that cause damage to the liver can result in the buildup of toxins that would normally be removed by a healthy liver. These toxins can cause the skin to become very sensitive to sunburn and can cause other signs of liver failure such as weight loss and poor performance. Some plants are toxic to the kidney – particularly plants such as oak trees that accumulate tannins. Cattle with kidney damage may show signs of reduced appetite, rapid weight loss, and increased water intake.

Some plants are toxic to the nervous system such as some types of ryegrass, locoweeds, and water hemlock. Cattle that eat these plants may suffer from rapid death or longer-term weight loss and nervous system signs depending on the specific plant and the amount consumed. Signs of nervous system problems include staggering, apparent blindness, exaggerated movements, and hyper-excitability.

Abortion or the development of birth defects can occur when pregnant cattle consume certain toxic plants. Abortions caused by toxic plants are often difficult to diagnose, and the birth defects caused by some toxic plants are the same or similar to defects caused by genetic problems or viral infection. Loco weeds, tobacco, lupine, and poison hemlock are known to cause birth defects in calves in certain situations when pregnant cows consume these plants.

In order to diagnose suspected plant poisonings you should work with your veterinarian and a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. Your veterinarian can help you to develop an accurate history and time-line for the problem. To identify the cause of losses due to poisonous plants, the pasture or pen should be inspected, both alive and dead animals should be examined, and diagnostic samples of plants, blood, and tissues should be properly collected and then evaluated by trained diagnostic laboratory personnel. The presence of toxic plants in pastures or hays is not proof that cattle have been harmed by the plants because many time cattle will refuse to eat them. However, finding evidence of consumption of potentially toxic plants by animals, either by observing evidence of grazing of suspected plants or by finding parts of these plants in the digestive tract of a dead animal is highly suggestive of poisonings.

Because removing all toxic plants from a range or pasture is not likely to be practical or successful, good grazing management using stocking density, fencing, water development and salt/supplement placement to maintain good pasture health will

minimize the incentive for cattle to graze toxic plants. If it appears that a toxic plant problem is occurring, cattle should be removed from the suspected pasture immediately and a veterinarian should be contacted. It is important to work with veterinarians, Extension agents, natural resource conservation service specialists, and range specialists who can all help develop a plan to keep pastures healthy and minimize the risk of toxic plant poisonings.

Input Costs, Pasture Turnout, Supplements

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the team is joined by special guest Dr. Justin Waggoner, KSU Beef Extension Specialist, to dig into the big question: When input costs rise, where can you cut without hurting your herd or your bottom line? The experts will also tackle feeding mineral after turnout for the summer. Dr. Waggoner will wrap up the episode by sharing a little about his research regarding navigating the nutritional limitations of cool season grasses.

3:43 Input Costs

11:42 Pasture Turnout

15:37 Supplementation During Cool Season Grasses:

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Spring Cleaning

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this episode we are switching things up by answering a myriad of listener questions to get producers ready for the coming season. The experts will discuss prolapses, mastitis, grass tetany, bulls and more. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:18 Prolapses

7:20 Mastitis

11:53 Magnesium

17:32 Bull Management

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Direct Fed Microbial

On this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Phillip Lancaster brings a research article studying the effects of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on digestibility. Dr. Brad White and Dr. Lancaster will discuss the results of this research as well as how it could help cows on forage.

Article Discussed: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf093

Listener Questions: Castration, Feeding Heifers, Average Daily Gain

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode the experts answer your listener questions. They start by discussing what age you should castrate calves and what vaccinations could be given. Next, Dr. Brian Lubbers and Dr. Phillip Lancaster discuss feeding heifers and some of the challenges that come along with that. Finally, they discuss average daily gain as well as feed to gain ratio. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:00 Castrating Calves

11:10 Feeding Heifers

15:54 Average Daily Gain

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Life cycle assessment of Beef Production in US and Canada

Understanding the overall sustainability of beef production is important for making continuous improvement allowing documentation of improvement over time. A couple of recent studies estimated the overall sustainability metrics of beef production in the US (Rotz et al., 2019) and Canada (Aboagye et al., 2024). In both countries, methane emissions were the primary greenhouse gas emitted, with the cow-calf sector accounting for more than 50% of the total. The primary use of fossil fuel energy was feed production in both countries. Additionally, the primary use of blue water was feed production in both countries. Blue water is surface or ground water used for irrigation, cattle drinking, and cleaning of facilities and equipment: it does not include green (rain) water that falls on crop fields and pasture.

Even though beef production in the US and Canada may seem relatively similar, there are subtle differences. For example, growing cattle in Canada may spend fewer days on pasture consuming high roughage diets leading to lower methane emissions. Feed production in the US uses more fertilizer per acre of arable land leading to greater fossil energy use. And the US uses more freshwater for agriculture production than Canada. The difference between the US and Canada in climate conditions is the primary driver in the differences in overall sustainability metrics.

Diving into Diets: Neonatal Diet

Dr. Phillip Lancaster brings us an article out of China that looks at what effects diet has on calves rumination and overall health. The study looks at calves with and without forage inclusion. They discuss the research procedure and how the results could apply to beef calves in the U.S.

Article Discussed: How neonatal diet affects the long-term development of rumination behavior, rumen fermentation and feed digestion in dairy calves fed a high milk level?

Yearling Bulls, Mineral Listener Question, Fall Born Calves

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode the experts dive into managing your yearling bulls. Next, they answer a listener question about adapting your mineral program throughout the year. Finally, the experts give some tips on handling fall born calves. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:16 Yearling Bulls: Bull Value Cow-Q-Lator

11:05 Listener Question: Mineral Program Adaptation

15:56 Managing Fall Born Calves

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Cover Crops, Changing Needles, Forward Planning

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts along with guest host Dr. Todd Gunderson answer a listener question about fall calving on a cover crop. Next they answer a listener question about changing needles and how often it should be done. Finally Dr. Pendell discusses planning ahead for the next year. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

4:31 Listener Question: Fall Calving on Cover Crops

11:05 Listener Question: Changing Needles

16:19 Forward Planning

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Late Gestational Nutrition

In this episode of Diving into Diets a Bovine Science Podcast Dr. White and Dr. Lancaster look at a research paper about the effects of poor nutrition on late gestation cows. They will dive into what this means for future research as well as their key takeaways.

Article Discussed: Colby A Redifer, Lindsey G Wichman, Shelby L Davies-Jenkins, Abigail R Rathert-Williams, Harvey C Freetly, Allison M Meyer, Late gestational nutrient restriction in primiparous beef females: Performance and metabolic status of lactating dams and pre-weaning calves, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 102, 2024, skae015, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae015