Epigenetics and Udder Quality

On this week’s BCI Cattle Chat episode, the experts answer a listener’s question comparing two genetically identical bulls raised in different environments. The group discusses whether early development and nutrition can influence fertility, longevity, or even the genetics passed on to offspring, diving into the emerging science of epigenetics. Lastly, the team tackles a listener question on udder quality, exploring how heritable udder traits are and when producers should use them as culling criteria in the herd.

3:13 Epigenetics

17:31 Udder Quality

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubci, Facebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget, if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Herd Health: Heifer Selection Strategies

On Herd Health, Dr. Brad White and Dr. Bob Larson discuss a 2025 study in the Canadian Journal of Animal Science on factors influencing heifer replacement and cow-calf profitability. The study focused on cow feed efficiency, longevity, heterosis, and lifetime productivity. Key findings include the importance of longevity, with heifers staying longer in the herd being more profitable. Crossbreeding, particularly those with more heterosis, reduced costs. Residual feed intake (RFI) was crucial, with lower RFI cows being more efficient and cost-effective. The study used data from 2011 to 2018, accounting for economic fluctuations, and found no significant differences between breeds.

Article Discussed: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385812533_Effects_of_cow_feed_efficiency_longevity_heterosis_and_lifetime_productivity_on_profitability_of_heifer_selection_and_cow-calf_operations 

Diving into Diets: Grazing Behavior

On this week’s episode of Diving into Diets Dr. Brad White and Dr. Philip Lancaster discuss a 2025 study on grazing behavior in cattle, focusing on factors like age, size, hide color, and forage quality. The study tracked 40 cows using GPS collars over three years, finding that older cows traveled further distances, possibly due to learning topography. Red cows traveled more in cold temperatures due to better heat retention from black hides. The study also noted that cows traveled further to high-quality forage areas, as measured by NDVI and IRG, and up slopes and to water sources. The study’s individual hypothesis testing approach limited the interpretation of confounding variables like production stage and weather.

Article Discussed: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871141325001258?via%3Dihub 

Herd Health

In this episode of Bovine Science, Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White discuss nutritional plans for your cow herd through the winter. They go through the cost difference between high-quality hay and low-quality hay with supplements. They also discuss how to avoid having your cows calve at a lighter weight. 

PlayPlay

Research Update, Pinkeye, A.I. Calving

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, the crew is joined by Danell Kopp who brings a research update. Next, they answer listener questions about pinkeye and A.I. in cows. Thanks for listening and enjoy the episode!

2:21 Research Update: Danell Kopp

10:39 Pinkeye

16:19 A.I. Calving

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Bull Creep Feeding, Anemia, New Diseases

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! In this week’s episode of Cattle Chat, we start by answering a listener question on creep feeding bulls. Next, the crew cover anemia; the causes, effects, and treatment. Finally they discuss investigating new diseases in your herd. Thanks for listening and enjoy the episode!

2:54 Creep Feeding Bulls
Article Mentioned: Review: The effect of nutrition on timing of pubertal onset and subsequent fertility in the bull

10:47 Anemia

16:39 Investigating New Diseases

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Bromaform

On this episode of Bovine Science Phillip Lancaster and Brad White discuss a recent research paper from UC Davis which looks at a bromoform based feed additive. They discuss the paper’s findings as well as it’s possible implications.

Article Discussed: The effect of Rumin8 Investigational Veterinary Product—a bromoform based feed additive—on enteric methane emissions, animal production parameters, and the rumen environment in feedlot cattle

Herd Health: Value of Records

In this episode of Bovine Science, Dr. Bob Larson and Dr. Brad White discuss keeping records. They go through surveys which analyzed which records are more important to producers. They also discuss tips on finding the right record system for you.

Tox Talk: Nodule Liver

Over a couple of weeks 8 cows die in a 200 cow herd. The only clue is a nodule on the liver. What cause the death? Dr. Scott Fritz explains on this episode of Bovine Science.

KSVDL Toxicology: https://ksvdl.org/laboratories/toxicology/

The toxicology website and Bovine Sciences with BCI podcasts have been sponsored in part through a veterinary services grant that Dr. Scott Fritz, Dr. Steve Ensley and Dr. Bob Larson have received to share more toxicology information and examples for people to understand what to submit and how to submit. Another part of that grant has been working with people and producer in the field.

Pasture Pulse: Calf Scours

In this episode of Bovine Science Dr. Matt Miesner is back to discuss calf scours. Dr Miesner brings some tips on rehydrating calves, the options available, and how long you should give the calf electrolytes. They also discuss resources that are available to assist in making decisions.

Resources discussed:
Hartnack, A. K., Niehaus, A. J., Rousseau, M., Pentecost, R. L., Miesner, M. D., & Anderson, D. E. (2015). Indications for and factors relating to outcome after rumenotomy or rumenostomy in cattle: 95 cases (1999–2011). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association247(6), 659-664. Retrieved Jun 9, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.247.6.659

Braun U. Ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal tract in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009 Nov;25(3):567-90,  https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-26375

Cockwill, K. R., McAllister, T. A., & Olson, M. E. (2005). Comparison of four rumenotomy techniques in cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 46(12), 1111–1115. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1687032/

Dead cattle have value too

No matter how well you take care of your cattle, some calves, yearling age animals, and even adults will die. Although a financial loss, these animals can be very valuable to your farm or ranch to help evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your health program and to provide information to your veterinarian to minimize future disease risk.

The term used to describe the thorough examination of a dead animal is necropsy. A veterinarian often uses a necropsy to determine the cause of death in the animal that died and more importantly, to determine if the rest of the herd is at-risk and if management changes need to be made to protect the herd.

It is important that the veterinarian start the necropsy with an open mind and to avoid having a preconceived diagnosis. There are also important tools that are needed for a proper necropsy including: sharp knives and other cutting instruments, bags to store samples, and appropriate cleansers and disinfectants to make sure that disease-causing germs cannot be spread to other animals.

A veterinarian starts the necropsy by getting a good history of the group or herd including the age, sex, and weight of the affected animals, how long the animal had been sick before death, and where the animal died and its position at death. In addition the veterinarian will determine what the herd or group has been eating and where it has been housed and if there is excessive mud, dust, or crowding. It is important to observe and possibly collect blood or other samples from healthy animals in the group, or from sick animals that show the same symptoms as the animals that died. Only after getting a good history and evaluating the environment will the veterinarian start to examine the dead animal by getting a general assessment of whether the animal appeared unthrifty prior to death and if there is evidence of swelling, fractures, wounds, or discharges from any body opening.

The veterinarian will then use a large knife to open the animal and begin a methodical examination of the body organs starting in the throat and chest by looking closely at the trachea and lungs and then the heart. Because pneumonia is a common threat to cattle, the location and type of any lung damage is noted. Joints such as the shoulder, hip, stifle, and hock are examined for evidence of abnormalities. The abdomen is then opened and the rumen and intestine and other organs are examined carefully. If the animal had symptoms indicating nervous system involvement, the brain and possibly spinal cord would be removed and examined.

Many times necropsies will include taking tissue and fluid samples and sending them to a diagnostic laboratory to be examined under a microscope or to be cultured to identify viruses or bacteria that may have contributed to the disease and death. Only samples taken from freshly dead animals and animals that died early in the disease process (preferably before being treated) are good candidates for sample submission for viral or bacterial culture. This is because in cases of pneumonia and other diseases, important viral populations can be cleared before death and bacterial populations can change so that later invaders can overgrowth the initial disease-causing bacteria, which can give misleading information about the type of virus or bacteria that were involved with the disease in its early stages.

Necropsies are not always successful at identifying the exact cause of death, but they are almost always helpful at identifying which possible diseases are not involved and for identifying which organs are healthy and which are diseased. Even if a diagnosis is not made, an important purpose of necropsies is to make sure that rare but dangerous diseases are not present on the farm or that common and easily diagnosed diseases are not a factor in the current problem.

To capture the most value for necropsies on your animals, you and your veterinarian should keep records so that trends or changes can be identified. The value of a single necropsy is not merely whether or not a diagnosis for that animal is made, but the value is based on the accumulation of evidence used to determine the level of health of the herd and if that level of health is changing. Necropsies are used extensively in evaluating the health status of all types of livestock herds and to aid in the diagnosis and control of disease. From a health standpoint, the most valuable animal on your farm or ranch may be the one that just died.

Finally, once the necropsy is completed, all the equipment used must be cleaned and disinfected and the coveralls, boots, and gloves worn by the veterinarian must be cleaned and disinfected or thrown away. In addition, the carcass of an animal that is necropsied must be disposed of properly. Each state has published rules about the disposal of dead livestock. Rendering, burial, composting, or burning are the most common means of disposal. If you are responsible for disposing of the body, be sure that you are in compliance with the law and that the dead animal is not a continued source of infection to other animals.

Using fecal nutrient analysis to determine grazing cow supplementation

Determining nutritive value of grazed forage is difficult and producers generally make assumptions about when forage nutritive value is low enough to warrant supplementation. The assumptions are not always correct because forage nutritive value is dynamic depending upon climate conditions and grazing management. Thus, cows are sometimes over or under supplemented.

Fecal consistency can provide clues as to the nutritive value of forages. Cows grazing lush green forage in the spring generally have very loose feces indicating low concentrations of fiber and high concentrations of protein. In contrast, cows grazing dormant standing forage in the winter will have very firm and dry feces indicating high concentrations of fiber and low concentrations of protein. These two extremes are easy to identify that the cows with loose feces do not need supplementation and the cows with firm dry feces need protein supplementation, and maybe energy supplementation, which is more difficult to discern from visual observation of feces.

A more detailed evaluation of feces can provide more information leading to better supplementation strategies and timing. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a tool to quick determine the chemical composition of a feedstuff or a fecal sample. Chemical analysis of fecal samples for protein and digestibility using NIRS coupled with a simple nutrition model can improve supplementation strategies of grazing cattle. This can be done with the help of the Grazingland Animal Nutrition Laboratory.

A recent study evaluated the use of the NIRS and a nutrition model in a cow herd in west Texas. The study compared two NIRS calibration analyses: a U.S.-scale calibration and a west Texas calibration. The U.S.-scale calibration poorly predicted the forage protein, but the west Texas calibration prediction of protein was much better indicating that regional calibration may be necessary for accurate prediction. The west Texas calibration coupled with the nutrition model was moderately accurate and precise in predicting body condition score of the cows. Possibly more importantly, the west Texas calibration coupled with the nutrition model was able to estimate changes in body condition score over time.

Forage nutritive value would change before body condition score. Being able to monitor changes in forage nutritive value through fecal analysis coupled with the nutrition model prediction of body condition changes would allow implementation of supplement strategies before changes in body condition occur. In conclusion, fecal analysis can be useful in determining supplementation strategies, but care should be taken that the NIRS calibration matches the local conditions.

Figure 1. Observed and predicted body condition score of beef cows grazing in west Texas. Adapted from Tolleson et al. (2025; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2024.11.004)

Adverse Drug Reactions

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

Although most of the time when we administer a treatment, vaccine, or other product to cattle we expect a positive outcome; occasionally cattle will have an adverse drug reaction. Adverse reactions can occur following the use of injectable antibiotics, dewormers, vaccines, insecticides, vitamin preparations, anti-inflammatory preparations, as well as skin ointments and other classes of drugs.

Adverse drug reactions are defined as any unintended and undesirable response to a drug and can be somewhat grouped as to being “human error” or “random”. Human error is often suspected if a high percentage of a group of cattle have an adverse drug reaction. The error can be due to an improper dose, route of administration, or combination of drugs. Improper dose can occur when a dose that is safe for another species results in an unsafe dose for cattle. Also, certain diseases such as liver or kidney disease or old age can cause a normally safe dose to cause problems in some individuals.

The label of any veterinary product will include instruction on the route of administration. The route can be: by mouth, applied to the skin, or injected into a muscle (intramuscularly/IM), under the skin (subcutaneously/SQ), or into a blood vessel (intravenously/IV). If a drug or product is labeled for one route of administration but given by another route, dangerously high doses of the active ingredient or other components of the product can result. It is important to understand that a veterinary product contains more than the active ingredient – it will also contain ingredients to keep the product stable over time and over a range of temperatures and other factors; and some non-active ingredients can be toxic at high doses.

Drug interactions can occur when one or more drugs antagonize another drug making it either ineffective or even dangerous. This can occur when drugs that were not intended to be mixed are mixed together in a bottle or syringe. The active drugs or the additives may cause the antagonism. Drug interactions can also occur even if antagonistic drugs are not mixed before injection, but are injected into the same animal and interact within the animal to cause adverse reactions.

You can reduce the risk of human error causing adverse drug reactions by only using drugs that you are very familiar with and that you have been trained to use by your veterinarian. Also, never mix drugs together in a bottle or syringe unless directed by the label. And, avoid giving multiple drugs at the same time unless your veterinarian advises you that it is safe.

Adverse drug reactions can also be caused by random, unknown factors. These types of reactions usually only affect one or a few members of a herd or group, but can cause a cluster of affected animals due to similar genetic factors in related animals. These types of reactions are unrelated to the dose or normal effects of the drug; and they are probably impossible to prevent. The active ingredient or carriers and other additives may cause random effects such as allergic reactions.

Allergic drug reactions in cattle most commonly occur following an injection and result in fluid build up in the lungs. The animals have sudden and severe respiratory problems making it difficult for them to breath. This type of reaction is called an anaphylactic response and often results in death. Rapid treatment with epinephrine and supportive care may help some affected cattle to survive.

Because the risk of adverse drug reactions is always small but present. Cattle should be observed after being treated with any veterinary product and not allowed to immediately leave the sight and care of the producer or veterinarian. Careful and appropriate use of veterinary products and attention following treatment are necessary to minimize the risk and cost of adverse drug reactions.

Heifer Listener Question, Bull Selection, Research Update

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode Dr. Bob Weaber is back to talk about genetics and selection. We also get a research update from Merri Beth Day where she discusses the economic implications of disease in feeder cattle. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:25 Heifer Listener Question

11:44 Bull Selection at a Sale

16:35 Research Update

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Rumen Degradable Protein with Distillers Grains: Is it Necessary?

Both the rumen microbes and animals need protein for maintenance and growth. In reality, they both need amino acids, which are the building blocks of protein. Microbes can use amino acids from digestion of feed protein or can synthesize amino acids from non-protein nitrogen such as urea. The animal must use preformed amino acids, it cannot synthesize amino acids from non-protein nitrogen. Preformed amino acids can come from digestion of feed protein or microbial protein.

In ruminant animals feed protein is either degraded in the rumen by microbes, termed rumen degradable protein, or digested in the small intestine of the animal, termed rumen undegradable protein. All feeds have some rumen degradable protein and some rumen undegradable protein, but varying the proportion of each. For example, soybean meal protein is approximately 75% rumen degradable protein and 25% rumen undegradable protein, whereas, dried distillers grains protein is approximately 40% rumen degradable protein and 60% rumen undegradable protein. Feeds like urea that are termed non-protein nitrogen are 100% rumen degradable protein.

In animals, amino acids are not stored in the body like carbohydrates are stored as fat. If amino acids are not needed for protein synthesis, the amino acids are broken down in the liver and the nitrogen in the amino acids are excreted in the urine. However, ruminant animals have the ability to recycle this nitrogen back to the rumen where microbes can convert the nitrogen to amino acids again. In this way, extra amino acids can provide microbes with the nitrogen they need for maintenance and growth.

Research has demonstrated that feeding 2 times the requirement of rumen degradable protein every other day provides the same response in low-quality forage digestion and intake as feeding the daily requirement of rumen degradable protein every day. The same response is due to the ability of cattle to recycle the excess amino acids/nitrogen for the microbes to continue to growth on the non-feeding day. Additionally, rumen undegradable protein can also be recycled, and potentially more efficiently because of slower rates of digestion.

A recent study evaluated whether adding a source of rumen degradable protein in the form of urea to a high rumen undegradable protein feed improved performance of calves grazing low-quality (crude protein ~6%) corn residue. Adding urea to dried distillers grains provided no improvement in growth of calves (Figure 1; Trial 1). In a subsequent trial, feeding dried distillers grains resulted in the same average daily gain as feeding a combination of SoyPass and soybean meal (Figure 1; Trial 2). SoyPass is a modified soybean meal product to increase the rumen undegradable protein proportion to 75%. The SoyPass/soybean meal combination provided mathematically a balance of rumen degradable and undegradable protein without accounting for the nitrogen recycling.

Cattle have the ability to recycle nitrogen from both rumen degradable and rumen undegradable protein. Feeding adequate protein from dried distillers grains does not require additional rumen degradable protein.

Figure 1. Average daily gain (ADG) and supplement intake (DMI) of calves fed dried distillers grains with or without urea (Trial 1) or fed dried distillers grains versus SoyPass/soybean meal (SBM) combination (Trial 2). Adapted from Tibbitts et al. (2024; https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2023-02522)

Herd Health: Case Study on Open Cows

In this mysterious episode of Herd Health Dr. Bob Larson brings in a case study with replacement heifers coming up 65% open. Find out how they got to the bottom of this case as well as what you may do if you find yourself in a similar situation. Thanks for listening and enjoy the episode!

Bovaer, Prepare for Calving, Johne’s Disease

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! The whole crew is back in the studio for this episode of Cattle Chat. The experts begin the episode by discussing the new product Bovaer, which is designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in cattle, and the public concerns about the product. Next they give some tips on calving in cold weather, and finish the episode by discussing Johne’s disease and how to deal with it. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:33 Bovaer

10:13 Calving in Cold Weather

15:19 Johne’s Disease

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Potential Use of Hemp Plant Material as Cattle Feed

In recent years the production of hemp has increased due to changes in federal regulations on its medical use. Growing hemp has many challenges, but if you or others in your area are growing hemp for cannabidiol (CBD) or fiber, there is likely a large amount of biomass remaining. Hemp can produce 15,000 to 20,000 pounds of dry yield per acre.

Different parts of the hemp plant vary widely in nutritive value. Crude protein for the stalk, leaves, and whole plant are reported recently as 5.3, 13.0, and 6.9%, respectively. Fiber fractions of the stalk, leaves, and whole plant were 84, 45, and 82% for neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and 65, 21, and 61% for acid detergent fiber (ADF), respectively (https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02018). The high fiber and low protein for the stalk indicates the likelihood of poor digestibility but the low fiber and high protein for leaves indicates high digestibility. A recent study found that the digestibility of the stalks was only 21% whereas the digestibility of the leaves was 93% and the whole plant was 67% (https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae019.028).

During the processing of the hemp plants, several by-products can be produced such as straight seed, dehulled seed, seed cake, seed meal, stalk, and seed hulls. The nutritive value of these can be seen in Figure 1. The seed and seed byproducts have high crude protein values similar to typical feedstuffs used in cattle diets such as soybean meal, cottonseed meal, and distillers grains. Byproducts from the stalk are of generally low quality similar to cottonseed hulls and wheat straw, and byproducts from the seed hulls are of intermediate nutritive value similar to soybean hulls. There is high variability in reported values. The crude protein ranged from 30 to 50% for seed meal and 19 to 28% for seed. The NDF ranged from 54 to 70%, and the ADF ranged from 44 to 54% for seed hulls. Thus, analysis of the batch to be used should be completed prior to formulating the diet.

Even though the hemp plant and byproducts from the use of hemp for human uses are of good nutritional value, legal restrictions prevent the use of hemp and its byproducts in livestock feed. There is currently little data available on the amount of cannabinoids (e.g., CBD and THC) in meat, milk, and eggs from livestock fed hemp. Additionally, there is minimal data on the effects of cannabinoids on animal health and welfare. However, research is investigating these effects and if approved, hemp and its byproducts could be valuable feedstuffs for cattle production.

After the Abstract: Hemotropic Mycoplasma

Dr. Brian Lubbers is back with another research article from the Journal of Dairy Science. This research looks at prevalence of hemotropic mycoplasma in heifers on Michigan farms. Dr. Lubbers and Dr. White break down this paper and discuss how it may be applied to beef cattle in Kansas.

Article Discussed: https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)00504-6/fulltext

IBR, Grazing Crop Stubble, Dose Accuracy

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode we have guest host Dr. Scott Fritz. Our experts begin the episode by discussing IBR and its effects on a cattle herd. Next Dr. Fritz gives some tips on things to look out for when grazing crop stubbles in order to avoid sickness. Finally, Dr. Brad White asks hosts about dose accuracy when giving vaccines. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

3:10 Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR)

11:26 Grazing Crop Stubble

16:32 Dose Accuracy

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Audio Player

BVD, Heifer Synchronization, Feeding Corn

Happy New Year! On this episode our experts begin by answering a listener question about BVD in their herd . Next ESTROTECT brings back Dr. Ken Odde to discuss estrus synchronization in his herd. Finally Dr. Lancaster does some calculating to decide what type of corn should be fed in a listener question. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:41 Listener Question: BVD Diagnosis

11:35 Dr. Ken Odde on Heifer Synchronization sponsored by ESTROTECT

19:32 Listener Question: Finishing Cattle on Corn

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

New World Screwworm

Bob Larson, DVM, PhD
Reproductive physiologist and Epidemiologist
Beef Cattle Institute
Kansas State University
RLarson@vet.k-state.edu

An old pest recently made news in November when the U.S. suspended Mexican cattle imports because a case of New World screwworm was identified in the southern part of Mexico. This pest used to be common in the southern U.S. but starting in the 1950s, the USDA, with the support of various cattlemen’s associations, worked to eradicate the fly from the U.S.; and then with partnerships with other countries, to push south through Mexico, Central America, and finally to Panama. The screwworm fly is still widespread in tropical areas of the Caribbean and South America.

A fly goes through four life stages: an adult fly lays hundreds of eggs, the eggs hatch into larvae (commonly called maggots), then they enter the pupa stage (cocoon-like form) where they grow into adult flies. For most flies, the adults lay eggs in fresh manure, decaying manure, decaying plant material, or occasionally decaying animal flesh (such as a wound with dead tissue). The screwworm is different in that the fly will lay eggs in any opening in otherwise healthy skin (such as the navel of newborn calves or a scratch or fresh wound), and the larvae (or maggots) will feed on the healthy tissue – causing severe damage or even death.

Before the fly was eradicated from the U.S., it caused millions of dollars of losses – and the damage extended beyond cattle and other livestock to any warm-blooded animal including wildlife, pets, and even people. The eradication of this parasite is an impressive success story that required years of effort and investment by the USDA and other federal agencies as well as cooperation with Mexico and other Central American and Caribbean countries. But, in order for the work and investment involved in the eradication effort to pay-off, a unique weakness in the screwworm fly lifecycle had to be exploited. Unlike other flies, a screwworm female only mates once. If she mates with a sterile male, she will never produce live offspring. Scientists at USDA used this information to begin looking for a method to sterilize male screwworms and found that a specific dose of radiation at a specific time in the pupa stage would sterilize the males while still allowing them to be able to mate.

By raising and sterilizing many millions of screwworm flies and then releasing them across the southern U.S. starting in the late 1950s, the screwworm was eradicated by 1966. However, keeping the screwworm fly out of the U.S. is a constant battle and several isolated outbreaks have occurred – most recently in 2016 in the Florida Keys. In order to reduce the likelihood of re-exposure, the U.S. has worked with Mexico and into Central America to use sterile flies to eradicate Screwworm flies all the way to a biologic barrier established in Panama.

Although the strategy to keep screwworms south of Panama has been mostly successful, the effort requires: continual release of sterile flies, restriction of animal movement, and rigorous monitoring for signs of screwworm infestation. The only current screwworm sterilization facility is in Panama and it produces about 20 million pupae per week. Because of the recent discovery of screwworms as far north as southern Mexico, the USDA and other agencies are working with Mexico and other countries in the area to re-establish an effective barrier in Panama.

Judging Teams, Finishing Cattle, Quick Fire Questions

Welcome to BCI Cattle Chat! On this episode our experts congratulate former student Jacob Klaudt on winning the national Livestock Judging Competition as well as congratulate the K-State meats judging team on a national championship. Next Dr. Lancaster answers a listener question pertaining to finishing steers at home and how to feed them. Finally we bring back guest host Dr. Todd Gunderson to answer some rapid fire questions from Dr. Brad White. Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the episode!

2:30 Youth Judging Teams

6:15 Listener Question: Finishing Cattle

11:26 Quick Questions with Dr. Todd Gunderson

For more on BCI Cattle Chat, follow us on X at @ksubciFacebook, and Instagram at @ksubci. Check out our website, ksubci.org. If you have any comments/questions/topic ideas, please send them to bci@ksu.edu. You can also email us to sign up for our weekly news blast! Don’t forget if you enjoy the show, please go give us a rating!

Diving into Diets: Vitamin A

In this episode of Diving into Diets a Bovine Science Podcast Dr. White and Dr. Lancaster look at a research paper about the guidelines for supplementing vitamin A. This research answers some questions about vitamin A in cattle but also raises some new ones for our hosts. Thanks for listening!

Link to Article: https://www.appliedanimalscience.org/article/S2590-2865(24)00094-6/fulltext